Mutual Learning between Researcher and Studied Communities as a Method in Liberationist Fieldwork in South Africa

Abstract This article argues that a liberationist approach to research should enable both researchers and communities to share the power of teaching and learning through knowledge exchange. Drawing on the author’s experiences, it highlights mutual learning in liberationist ethnographic research, where both researchers and communities act as interlocutors. However, this exchange is not necessarily equal; instead, researchers should recognize natural moments that could empower both parties and position them to teach and learn from each other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Theology
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-20240022
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mutual Learning between Researcher and Studied Communities as a Method in Liberationist Fieldwork in South Africa

Clementine Nishimwe
Journal of Empirical Theology
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Mutual Learning between Researcher and Studied Communities as a Method in Liberationist Fieldwork in South Africa

Clementine Nishimwe
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that a liberationist approach to research should enable both researchers and communities to share the power of teaching and learning through knowledge exchange. Drawing on the author’s experiences, it highlights mutual learning in liberationist ethnographic research, where both researchers and communities act as interlocutors. However, this exchange is not necessarily equal; instead, researchers should recognize natural moments that could empower both parties and position them to teach and learn from each other.

Journal of Empirical TheologyVol. 38(1)
Åbo Akademi University (FI), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.