Diversity, Inclusion and Transparency in Rail Companies’ Communication

The recent events of the Covid-19 pandemic and the renewed upsurge of social movements in the late 2010s, such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo, have brought public attention to the question of inequality and, for that matter, to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). Set against this background, the aim of the study is to investigate whether, and if so how, EDI is transparently framed in the CSR reports belonging to a sample of rail companies operating in different countries and continents. In an effort to explore the companies’ attitudes towards EDI as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, the analysis examines a sample of CSR reports that were disclosed in 2018 (pre-Covid-19) and 2022 (post-Covid-19). In particular, the sections of the reports covering EDI topics are scrutinized quantitatively with the support of corpus linguistics tools to identify frequent lexico-grammatical patterns, and qualitatively through discourse analysis to verify whether the information provided is transparent, namely complete, understandable and reliable. The comparative and micro-diachronic study sets out to highlight similarities and differences in the discourse strategies adopted by the rail companies for (un)transparent reporting of information relating to diversity and inclusion issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Linguistics
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v17i3.22861
Primary Topic
Transport and Economic Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity, Inclusion and Transparency in Rail Companies’ Communication

Donatella Malavasi
International Journal of Linguistics
Transport and Economic Policies
article

Diversity, Inclusion and Transparency in Rail Companies’ Communication

Donatella Malavasi
article en

Abstract

The recent events of the Covid-19 pandemic and the renewed upsurge of social movements in the late 2010s, such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo, have brought public attention to the question of inequality and, for that matter, to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). Set against this background, the aim of the study is to investigate whether, and if so how, EDI is transparently framed in the CSR reports belonging to a sample of rail companies operating in different countries and continents. In an effort to explore the companies’ attitudes towards EDI as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, the analysis examines a sample of CSR reports that were disclosed in 2018 (pre-Covid-19) and 2022 (post-Covid-19). In particular, the sections of the reports covering EDI topics are scrutinized quantitatively with the support of corpus linguistics tools to identify frequent lexico-grammatical patterns, and qualitatively through discourse analysis to verify whether the information provided is transparent, namely complete, understandable and reliable. The comparative and micro-diachronic study sets out to highlight similarities and differences in the discourse strategies adopted by the rail companies for (un)transparent reporting of information relating to diversity and inclusion issues.

International Journal of LinguisticsVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Transport and Economic Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.