Mitigating crisis impact: The influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial firms’ financial performance

This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the financial performance of firms by analyzing how it affects the relationship between capital structure and financial performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on non-financial publicly listed firms in the USA, UK, Canada, Japan, and Italy from 2018 to 2021. Our findings reveal that during the pandemic short-term debt significantly negatively impacts return on assets (ROA), specifically a decrease of 35%. Additionally, we provide empirical evidence that CSR positively influences financial performance. In particular, the combined CSR scores, as well as environmental and social activities, positively affect ROA, return on equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q across all analyses. We observe that a high combined score (ESG) mitigates the adverse effects of all types of debt on ROA and ROE. However, the positive impact on Tobin’s Q is more pronounced regarding long-term and total debt by 0.987 % and 0.937%, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that high environmental, social, and governance activities have a more substantial positive effect on the relationship between total debt and both ROE and Tobin’s Q. Overall, our study suggests that investing in CSR can be a wise strategy for firms, not only helping to alleviate the adverse effects of debt during market downturns but also switch the adverse effect to positive which ultimately enhancing financial performance. • Corporate social responsibility (CSR) played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic. • The adverse effects of debt were particularly pronounced during this period. However, CSR demonstrated the ability to mitigate the negative impact of debt on financial performance in the context of the pandemic. • Furthermore, the evaluation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, along with their composite score and individual components, proved essential in alleviating the detrimental effects of debt on financial outcomes during COVID-19. • Strategic CSR initiatives not only safeguarded companies' profits but also preserved their reputations amid the crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104180
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating crisis impact: The influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial firms’ financial performance

Heitham Al-Hajieh, Mustafa Besim, Diana Alhajjeah
6 citations
International Review of Economics & Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
article

Mitigating crisis impact: The influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial firms’ financial performance

Heitham Al-Hajieh, Mustafa Besim, Diana Alhajjeah
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the financial performance of firms by analyzing how it affects the relationship between capital structure and financial performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on non-financial publicly listed firms in the USA, UK, Canada, Japan, and Italy from 2018 to 2021. Our findings reveal that during the pandemic short-term debt significantly negatively impacts return on assets (ROA), specifically a decrease of 35%. Additionally, we provide empirical evidence that CSR positively influences financial performance. In particular, the combined CSR scores, as well as environmental and social activities, positively affect ROA, return on equity (ROE), and Tobin’s Q across all analyses. We observe that a high combined score (ESG) mitigates the adverse effects of all types of debt on ROA and ROE. However, the positive impact on Tobin’s Q is more pronounced regarding long-term and total debt by 0.987 % and 0.937%, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that high environmental, social, and governance activities have a more substantial positive effect on the relationship between total debt and both ROE and Tobin’s Q. Overall, our study suggests that investing in CSR can be a wise strategy for firms, not only helping to alleviate the adverse effects of debt during market downturns but also switch the adverse effect to positive which ultimately enhancing financial performance. • Corporate social responsibility (CSR) played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic. • The adverse effects of debt were particularly pronounced during this period. However, CSR demonstrated the ability to mitigate the negative impact of debt on financial performance in the context of the pandemic. • Furthermore, the evaluation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, along with their composite score and individual components, proved essential in alleviating the detrimental effects of debt on financial outcomes during COVID-19. • Strategic CSR initiatives not only safeguarded companies' profits but also preserved their reputations amid the crisis.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 101
Applied Science Private University (JO), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Eastern Mediterranean University (CY)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.