Integrating generative AI and load reduction instruction to individualize and optimize students' learning

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is significantly influencing teaching and learning. The uptake of genAI in schools and universities/colleges has been rapid. But it has also been ad hoc and often ineffectively implemented, with little recognition of the need to manage cognitive burden to account for individual differences between novice and expert learners. Harnessing cognitive and instructional psychology principles, load reduction instruction (LRI) offers guidance for implementing genAI in ways that accommodate differences among novice and expert learners. LRI comprises five principles aimed at productively easing the cognitive burden on learners: (1) difficulty reduction as appropriate to prior learning, (2) support and scaffolding, (3) structured practice, (4) feedback-feedforward, and (5) independent practice and problem-solving. We suggest that the future of genAI-related learning can benefit from synthesizing genAI implementation with the core principles underpinning LRI to effectively manage the cognitive burden on diverse students as they engage with genAI to learn. • Much generative AI (genAI) use in education has been ad hoc and ineffective. • GenAI can impose problematic cognitive burden on learners. • Load reduction instruction (LRI) can reduce burden in genAI-related learning. • LRI can accommodate individual differences among novice and expert learners. • An LRI-informed genAI prompt is provided as a worked example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102723
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating generative AI and load reduction instruction to individualize and optimize students' learning

Paul Ginns, Andrew J. Martin, Lilith Rüschenpöhler, Roger Kennett et al.
10 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
24.81
article

Integrating generative AI and load reduction instruction to individualize and optimize students' learning

Paul Ginns, Andrew J. Martin, Lilith Rüschenpöhler, Roger Kennett, Lala Bumela Sudimantara, Ema Wilianti Dewi, Rebecca J. Collie, Danny Liu
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is significantly influencing teaching and learning. The uptake of genAI in schools and universities/colleges has been rapid. But it has also been ad hoc and often ineffectively implemented, with little recognition of the need to manage cognitive burden to account for individual differences between novice and expert learners. Harnessing cognitive and instructional psychology principles, load reduction instruction (LRI) offers guidance for implementing genAI in ways that accommodate differences among novice and expert learners. LRI comprises five principles aimed at productively easing the cognitive burden on learners: (1) difficulty reduction as appropriate to prior learning, (2) support and scaffolding, (3) structured practice, (4) feedback-feedforward, and (5) independent practice and problem-solving. We suggest that the future of genAI-related learning can benefit from synthesizing genAI implementation with the core principles underpinning LRI to effectively manage the cognitive burden on diverse students as they engage with genAI to learn. • Much generative AI (genAI) use in education has been ad hoc and ineffective. • GenAI can impose problematic cognitive burden on learners. • Load reduction instruction (LRI) can reduce burden in genAI-related learning. • LRI can accommodate individual differences among novice and expert learners. • An LRI-informed genAI prompt is provided as a worked example.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 121
The University of Sydney (AU), NSW Department of Education (AU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), UNSW Sydney (AU), Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Cirebon (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
24.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.