Assessment of ecological and landscape services in urban green spaces in South China Karst

The assessment of urban green space (UGS) ecological and landscape services includes two aspects of ecological environment and landscape perception, which are crucial to sustainable development. Based on the three-dimensional Karst UGS environment, this study evaluates UGS ecological and landscape services using the index evaluation system with multi-dimensional attributes and the TOPSIS method. The results shows that: (1) the distribution of Karst UGS ecosystem service generally shows a “high in the east and low in the west” pattern, while the landscape perception service shows nonlinear; (2) SC has the highest weight, accounting for 20.89%; (3) the proportion of low-quality UGS was 89.63%; and (4) there is significant correlation between ecological benefit indicators. GSA has a significant correlation with the other seven indicators. This evaluation of UGS in South China Karst from ecological, residential, and social perspectives offers insights for global Karst urban management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Heritage Science
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01759-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of ecological and landscape services in urban green spaces in South China Karst

Linlin Yang, Xueling Wang, Yongkuan Chi, Yuehua Song et al.
3 citations
npj Heritage Science
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Assessment of ecological and landscape services in urban green spaces in South China Karst

Linlin Yang, Xueling Wang, Yongkuan Chi, Yuehua Song, Xingyan Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The assessment of urban green space (UGS) ecological and landscape services includes two aspects of ecological environment and landscape perception, which are crucial to sustainable development. Based on the three-dimensional Karst UGS environment, this study evaluates UGS ecological and landscape services using the index evaluation system with multi-dimensional attributes and the TOPSIS method. The results shows that: (1) the distribution of Karst UGS ecosystem service generally shows a “high in the east and low in the west” pattern, while the landscape perception service shows nonlinear; (2) SC has the highest weight, accounting for 20.89%; (3) the proportion of low-quality UGS was 89.63%; and (4) there is significant correlation between ecological benefit indicators. GSA has a significant correlation with the other seven indicators. This evaluation of UGS in South China Karst from ecological, residential, and social perspectives offers insights for global Karst urban management.

npj Heritage ScienceVol. 13(1)
Guizhou Normal University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.