Comparison study of silty clay-gravel mixture-geotextile interface without and with polyurethane foam adhesive injection

The interface between geotextile and geomaterials plays a crucial role in the performance of various geotechnical structures. Soil–geotextile interfaces often suffer reduced performance under environmental stressors such as rainfall and cyclic loading, limiting the reliability of geotechnical structures. This study examines the influence of gravel content ( G c ), compaction degree ( C d ), and rainfall duration ( R d ) on the mobilized shear strength at the silty clay–gravel mixture (SCGM)–geotextile interface through a comprehensive series of direct shear tests under both static and cyclic loadings. A novel approach using Polyurethane Foam Adhesive (PFA) injection is introduced to enhance the interface behavior. The results reveal that increasing G c from 0% to 70% leads to a 35–70% improvement in mobilized shear strength and friction angle, while cohesion decreases by 15%–60%, depending on C d . A higher C d further boosts shear strength by 6%–70%, influenced by Gc and normal stress levels. Under cyclic loading, increasing displacement amplitude reduces shear stiffness (K), while having minimal impact on the damping ratio (D); K and D appear unaffected by the number of cycles in non-injected samples. Rainfall reduces mobilized shear strength by 8%–25%, depending on the normal stress, with a 47% drop in friction angle and a 24% increase in cohesion after 120 minutes of rainfall exposure. In contrast, PFA-injected samples exhibit a marked increase in mobilized shear strength under both dry and wet conditions, primarily attributed to enhanced cohesion. Notably, PFA treatment proves particularly effective in maintaining higher shear strength and stiffness in rainfall-affected interfaces, demonstrating its potential in improving geotextile–soil interaction under challenging environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04791
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison study of silty clay-gravel mixture-geotextile interface without and with polyurethane foam adhesive injection

Wei-Qiang Feng, Yingling Fang, Meysam Bayat, Zohreh Mousavi et al.
2 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.91
article

Comparison study of silty clay-gravel mixture-geotextile interface without and with polyurethane foam adhesive injection

Wei-Qiang Feng, Yingling Fang, Meysam Bayat, Zohreh Mousavi, Jianxin Liu, Bo Xiong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The interface between geotextile and geomaterials plays a crucial role in the performance of various geotechnical structures. Soil–geotextile interfaces often suffer reduced performance under environmental stressors such as rainfall and cyclic loading, limiting the reliability of geotechnical structures. This study examines the influence of gravel content ( G c ), compaction degree ( C d ), and rainfall duration ( R d ) on the mobilized shear strength at the silty clay–gravel mixture (SCGM)–geotextile interface through a comprehensive series of direct shear tests under both static and cyclic loadings. A novel approach using Polyurethane Foam Adhesive (PFA) injection is introduced to enhance the interface behavior. The results reveal that increasing G c from 0% to 70% leads to a 35–70% improvement in mobilized shear strength and friction angle, while cohesion decreases by 15%–60%, depending on C d . A higher C d further boosts shear strength by 6%–70%, influenced by Gc and normal stress levels. Under cyclic loading, increasing displacement amplitude reduces shear stiffness (K), while having minimal impact on the damping ratio (D); K and D appear unaffected by the number of cycles in non-injected samples. Rainfall reduces mobilized shear strength by 8%–25%, depending on the normal stress, with a 47% drop in friction angle and a 24% increase in cohesion after 120 minutes of rainfall exposure. In contrast, PFA-injected samples exhibit a marked increase in mobilized shear strength under both dry and wet conditions, primarily attributed to enhanced cohesion. Notably, PFA treatment proves particularly effective in maintaining higher shear strength and stiffness in rainfall-affected interfaces, demonstrating its potential in improving geotextile–soil interaction under challenging environmental conditions.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 22
Central South University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Guangzhou Design Institute (CN), China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN), Islamic Azad University of Najafabad (IR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.