Contrasting directionalities in responsible innovation, lessons from the salmon farming industry in Chile and Norway

• There are contrasting perceptions about the directionality of innovation with gene technology in the salmon faming industry in Chile and Norway. • There is a need for developing a better understanding about why directionality is performed differently in a global multifaceted reality. • The directionality of innovation systems can be studied (1) by determining how key concepts of risk perception are related to each other and (2) by distinguishing actors generating valuations from those generating knowledge. • The reason for which there are contrasting directionalities in the studied innovation systems is because of how inclusion is performed within them and the consequent way in which key concepts about risk perception of gene technology are related to each other. • Policy making in the innovation system in Norway should aim to minimize the politization of risk perceptions of gene technology, while the innovation system in Chile should aim to include more non-expert voices as to make it more representative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Society
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102946
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting directionalities in responsible innovation, lessons from the salmon farming industry in Chile and Norway

Joaquin Zenteno Hopp
2 citations
Technology in Society
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
article

Contrasting directionalities in responsible innovation, lessons from the salmon farming industry in Chile and Norway

Joaquin Zenteno Hopp
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• There are contrasting perceptions about the directionality of innovation with gene technology in the salmon faming industry in Chile and Norway. • There is a need for developing a better understanding about why directionality is performed differently in a global multifaceted reality. • The directionality of innovation systems can be studied (1) by determining how key concepts of risk perception are related to each other and (2) by distinguishing actors generating valuations from those generating knowledge. • The reason for which there are contrasting directionalities in the studied innovation systems is because of how inclusion is performed within them and the consequent way in which key concepts about risk perception of gene technology are related to each other. • Policy making in the innovation system in Norway should aim to minimize the politization of risk perceptions of gene technology, while the innovation system in Chile should aim to include more non-expert voices as to make it more representative.

Technology in SocietyVol. 82
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
4.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.