Test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux: A reliable multiple-choice assessment tool

This study presents the development and validation of a novel multiple-choice test designed to assess university students’ conceptual understanding of electric field, force, and flux. The test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux was constructed based on the results of previous studies using a phenomenographic approach to classify common errors in these concepts. The final 10-item test, designed with targeted distractors, was administered to 116 students enrolled in an introductory electricity and magnetism course. Statistical analyses, including item difficulty and discrimination indices, confirmed the reliability and discriminatory power of the test. Students’ performance revealed significant misconceptions in applying the superposition principle, Gauss’s law, and electric force interactions. The results of this study provide valuable insights into students’ learning challenges and offer physics educators and researchers a useful tool for assessing conceptual understanding and guiding instructional improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/98gy-2m6g
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux: A reliable multiple-choice assessment tool

Karl J. Friston
2 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
7.06
article

Test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux: A reliable multiple-choice assessment tool

Karl J. Friston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study presents the development and validation of a novel multiple-choice test designed to assess university students’ conceptual understanding of electric field, force, and flux. The test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux was constructed based on the results of previous studies using a phenomenographic approach to classify common errors in these concepts. The final 10-item test, designed with targeted distractors, was administered to 116 students enrolled in an introductory electricity and magnetism course. Statistical analyses, including item difficulty and discrimination indices, confirmed the reliability and discriminatory power of the test. Students’ performance revealed significant misconceptions in applying the superposition principle, Gauss’s law, and electric force interactions. The results of this study provide valuable insights into students’ learning challenges and offer physics educators and researchers a useful tool for assessing conceptual understanding and guiding instructional improvements.

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 21(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
7.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.