Polarization of opportunity

• Measures of inequality of opportunity do not adequately capture polarization. • Polarization indexes can be applied to distributions to assess the polarization of opportunities. • Opportunity polarization is a distinct concept from both outcome polarization and inequality of opportunity. • In the US, while inequality of opportunity and outcome polarization have increased over the last 35 years, opportunity polarization has not. • The reduction in inequality during the 1960s and 1970s is the main reason why opportunity polarization has not increased for the following generation. We introduce the concept of polarization of opportunities (POp) to explore how various circumstances shape unfair inequalities. While conventional measures of inequality of opportunity (IOp) focus on outcome disparities linked to factors such as race or gender, they do not account for how these circumstances group individuals into relatively uniform clusters. POp fills this gap by examining both the influence of circumstances and their role in clustering individuals into distinct poles. Using U.S. data, our analysis shows that while income polarization and IOp have risen over time, POp has decreased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112386
Primary Topic
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarization of opportunity

Paolo Brunori, Vanesa Jordá, Pedro Salas-Rojo
Economics Letters
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
article

Polarization of opportunity

Paolo Brunori, Vanesa Jordá, Pedro Salas-Rojo
article en

Abstract

• Measures of inequality of opportunity do not adequately capture polarization. • Polarization indexes can be applied to distributions to assess the polarization of opportunities. • Opportunity polarization is a distinct concept from both outcome polarization and inequality of opportunity. • In the US, while inequality of opportunity and outcome polarization have increased over the last 35 years, opportunity polarization has not. • The reduction in inequality during the 1960s and 1970s is the main reason why opportunity polarization has not increased for the following generation. We introduce the concept of polarization of opportunities (POp) to explore how various circumstances shape unfair inequalities. While conventional measures of inequality of opportunity (IOp) focus on outcome disparities linked to factors such as race or gender, they do not account for how these circumstances group individuals into relatively uniform clusters. POp fills this gap by examining both the influence of circumstances and their role in clustering individuals into distinct poles. Using U.S. data, our analysis shows that while income polarization and IOp have risen over time, POp has decreased.

Economics LettersVol. 253
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), University of Florence (IT), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Fundación Ramón Areces
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.