Radical Prostatectomy: Evolution of Surgical Techniques from Laparoscopy to Robotics

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Radical prostatectomy is a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and functional results between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients who underwent LRP (n = 60) or RARP (n = 60). Perioperative parameters, including operative time, hospitalization duration, blood transfusion rate, wound healing complications, urinary catheterization duration, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and urinary incontinence, were assessed. Statistical analyses included Student's t-, Mann-Whitney U, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests. <b>Results</b>: RARP was associated with significantly shorter operative time, compared with LRP (147.25 vs. 188.30 min, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in hospitalization duration, transfusion rates, or overall complication rates. However, impaired wound healing was less frequent in the RARP group, with a 10% lower incidence, compared with the LRP group (<i>p</i> = 0.0946). Similarly, UTIs occurred less often in the RARP group (six vs. one cases; <i>p</i> = 0.0544). Urinary incontinence was significantly less frequent following RARP, with its incidence being more than twice as low, compared with the LRP group (<i>p</i> = 0.0032). Additionally, the RARP group had significantly lower International Prostate Symptom Scores, with a mean difference of 7.83 points, indicating improved urinary function. No significant differences were found in sexual function (IIEF-5 scores). <b>Conclusions</b>: RARP offers advantages over LRP, including reduced operative time, lower rates of wound healing complications, decreased incidence of urinary incontinence, and improved postoperative urinary function. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and assess long-term functional and oncological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radical Prostatectomy: Evolution of Surgical Techniques from Laparoscopy to Robotics

Ryszard Skiba, Tomasz Waldemar Kaminski, Tomasz Ząbkowski, Tomasz Syryło et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Radical Prostatectomy: Evolution of Surgical Techniques from Laparoscopy to Robotics

Ryszard Skiba, Tomasz Waldemar Kaminski, Tomasz Ząbkowski, Tomasz Syryło, Hubert Andrzej Krzepkowski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Radical prostatectomy is a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and functional results between laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients who underwent LRP (n = 60) or RARP (n = 60). Perioperative parameters, including operative time, hospitalization duration, blood transfusion rate, wound healing complications, urinary catheterization duration, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and urinary incontinence, were assessed. Statistical analyses included Student's t-, Mann-Whitney U, and χ<sup>2</sup> tests. <b>Results</b>: RARP was associated with significantly shorter operative time, compared with LRP (147.25 vs. 188.30 min, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in hospitalization duration, transfusion rates, or overall complication rates. However, impaired wound healing was less frequent in the RARP group, with a 10% lower incidence, compared with the LRP group (<i>p</i> = 0.0946). Similarly, UTIs occurred less often in the RARP group (six vs. one cases; <i>p</i> = 0.0544). Urinary incontinence was significantly less frequent following RARP, with its incidence being more than twice as low, compared with the LRP group (<i>p</i> = 0.0032). Additionally, the RARP group had significantly lower International Prostate Symptom Scores, with a mean difference of 7.83 points, indicating improved urinary function. No significant differences were found in sexual function (IIEF-5 scores). <b>Conclusions</b>: RARP offers advantages over LRP, including reduced operative time, lower rates of wound healing complications, decreased incidence of urinary incontinence, and improved postoperative urinary function. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and assess long-term functional and oncological outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(10)
Versiti Blood Center of Wisconsin (US), Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.