Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: the roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation

Abstract Firms increasingly face strategic choices in the innovation process concerning how and to what extent they should source knowledge from external parties. We offer new insight into the organizational design aspect of this process. Specifically, we build a model informed by organization theory and organizational economics to examine how firms’ returns from absorbing knowledge vary as a function of their choices concerning the specialization of gatekeepers and the delegation of decision-making authority. We compare returns under different organizational configurations and contingencies and derive propositions about how firms should optimally organize to absorb external knowledge. We provide qualitative evidence of how firms organize their external knowledge absorption activities from four “real-life” cases that illustrate the propositions of our model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: the roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation

Angelo Cavallo, Nicolai J. Foss, Massimo G. Colombo
1 citations
Industrial and Corporate Change
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
article

Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: the roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation

Angelo Cavallo, Nicolai J. Foss, Massimo G. Colombo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Firms increasingly face strategic choices in the innovation process concerning how and to what extent they should source knowledge from external parties. We offer new insight into the organizational design aspect of this process. Specifically, we build a model informed by organization theory and organizational economics to examine how firms’ returns from absorbing knowledge vary as a function of their choices concerning the specialization of gatekeepers and the delegation of decision-making authority. We compare returns under different organizational configurations and contingencies and derive propositions about how firms should optimally organize to absorb external knowledge. We provide qualitative evidence of how firms organize their external knowledge absorption activities from four “real-life” cases that illustrate the propositions of our model.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 34(5)
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.