Energy‐Based Trajectory Tracking for Underactuated Mechanical Systems: Velocity‐Free and Disturbance Rejection Methods

ABSTRACT This work investigates three energy‐shaping control approaches to address the trajectory‐tracking problem for specific classes of underactuated mechanical systems. In particular, the notions of contractive systems and dynamic extensions are utilized to solve the trajectory‐tracking problem while addressing implementation issues such as the lack of velocity sensors and the presence of constant disturbances. To this end, a first tracking controller is developed without the need for velocity measurements. A second controller is introduced, solving the trajectory‐tracking problem while rejecting matched constant disturbances. Then, a third approach establishes conditions to combine both mentioned controllers. It is shown that the proposed design methods guarantee exponential convergence of closed‐loop systems for specific classes of underactuated mechanical systems. The third method is illustrated with an example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.8014
Primary Topic
Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy‐Based Trajectory Tracking for Underactuated Mechanical Systems: Velocity‐Free and Disturbance Rejection Methods

Arjan van der Schaft, Pablo Borja, N. Javanmardi, Jacquelien M.A. Scherpen et al.
International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems
article

Energy‐Based Trajectory Tracking for Underactuated Mechanical Systems: Velocity‐Free and Disturbance Rejection Methods

Arjan van der Schaft, Pablo Borja, N. Javanmardi, Jacquelien M.A. Scherpen, Mohammad Javad Yazdanpanah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This work investigates three energy‐shaping control approaches to address the trajectory‐tracking problem for specific classes of underactuated mechanical systems. In particular, the notions of contractive systems and dynamic extensions are utilized to solve the trajectory‐tracking problem while addressing implementation issues such as the lack of velocity sensors and the presence of constant disturbances. To this end, a first tracking controller is developed without the need for velocity measurements. A second controller is introduced, solving the trajectory‐tracking problem while rejecting matched constant disturbances. Then, a third approach establishes conditions to combine both mentioned controllers. It is shown that the proposed design methods guarantee exponential convergence of closed‐loop systems for specific classes of underactuated mechanical systems. The third method is illustrated with an example.

International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear ControlVol. 35(14)
University of Groningen (NL), University of Tehran (IR), University of Plymouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy‐Based Trajectory Tracking for Underactuated Mechanical Systems: Velocity‐Free and Disturbance Rejection Methods — Arjan van der Schaft, Pablo Borja, et al. · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS