Future Theft: Fossil Capitalization, Ecological Dispossession, and Climate Reparations

This article criticizes the way fossil capitalization dispossesses the future. Turning fossil fuel into capital entails the legal enclosure, calculative cheapening, and material extraction/pollution of the future. Fossil investors’ ‘present values’ hinge on the misery of those dispossessed by climate emergencies. Fossil capitalization is premised on ‘future theft’ understood as a temporally inverted form of ‘original accumulation’. The durability of inequality created by asset wealth is compounded by the durability of carbon waste. Climate economics legitimizes and entrenches this pattern by discounting the future and failing to assign responsibilities for climate costs. Tort litigations allow climate victims to sue fossil fuel companies for compensation. However, they remain limited by the strictures of liberal property law. Climate reparations promise to overcome these limits by reclaiming the stolen future without recourse to previously settled property rights. Still, they cannot escape the vicious tempo-material trajectories engendered by fossil assets and their carbon afterlives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251334367
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future Theft: Fossil Capitalization, Ecological Dispossession, and Climate Reparations

Andreas Folkers
3 citations
Theory Culture & Society
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.32
article

Future Theft: Fossil Capitalization, Ecological Dispossession, and Climate Reparations

Andreas Folkers
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article criticizes the way fossil capitalization dispossesses the future. Turning fossil fuel into capital entails the legal enclosure, calculative cheapening, and material extraction/pollution of the future. Fossil investors’ ‘present values’ hinge on the misery of those dispossessed by climate emergencies. Fossil capitalization is premised on ‘future theft’ understood as a temporally inverted form of ‘original accumulation’. The durability of inequality created by asset wealth is compounded by the durability of carbon waste. Climate economics legitimizes and entrenches this pattern by discounting the future and failing to assign responsibilities for climate costs. Tort litigations allow climate victims to sue fossil fuel companies for compensation. However, they remain limited by the strictures of liberal property law. Climate reparations promise to overcome these limits by reclaiming the stolen future without recourse to previously settled property rights. Still, they cannot escape the vicious tempo-material trajectories engendered by fossil assets and their carbon afterlives.

Theory Culture & Society
Institute for Social-Ecological Research (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.