Optimizing one-leg standing test duration for screening functional decline in community-dwelling older adults
• The one-leg standing test (10–60 s) was associated with mobility and balance. • The one-leg standing test, at any duration, shows no association with past-year fall history. • 10-s one-leg stand test may screen severe functional impairments. • 30-s one-leg stand test may detect general mobility limitations. • 60-s one-leg stand may identify early decline in high-functioning adults. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether the ability to maintain one-leg standing test for varying durations (10, 30, or 60 s) is associated with physical function and fall history. 158 community-dwelling older adults participated. They performed the one-leg standing test for a maximum of 60 s and were categorized into those who could or could not maintain the position at each time point. Physical function was assessed through mobility (gait speed and five times sit-to-stand test), balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and two-step test), and knee extension strength. Fall history was self-reported. The proportions unable to maintain standing increased with test durations: 14.6 % for 10 s, 26.6 % for 30 s, and 41.1 % for 60 s. Independent t -tests showed that the maintained groups demonstrated significantly better mobility and balance performance than the non-maintained groups at each duration (all p < 0.01), and that the maintained groups at 10 s and 30 s exhibited significantly greater knee extension strength ( p < 0.01). Multiple regression analyses confirmed that the one-leg standing was independently associated with physical function outcomes. Chi-square tests revealed no significant association between standing duration and fall history. The one-leg standing test was consistently associated with physical function but showed limited ability to predict fall history. A shorter duration (10 s) effectively detected severe impairments, whereas a longer duration (60 s) was more sensitive for identifying early declines. The choice of test duration should be guided by the specific functional deficits being assessed.
Authors
- Toshimitsu Ohmine (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-7288)
- Shuji Okuno
- Akira Iwata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-2553)
- Keita Sasada
- Atsuki Kanayama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-2011)
- Izumi Arihara
- Ryoga Ueba
- Saki Yamamoto
- Kenichiro Tsubokura
- Gaito Kitada
Institutions
- Kansai University of Welfare Sciences (JP)
- Osaka City General Hospital (JP)
- Nara City Hospital (JP)
- Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus
- Published
- 2025-05-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100169
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 14.28