Optimizing one-leg standing test duration for screening functional decline in community-dwelling older adults

• The one-leg standing test (10–60 s) was associated with mobility and balance. • The one-leg standing test, at any duration, shows no association with past-year fall history. • 10-s one-leg stand test may screen severe functional impairments. • 30-s one-leg stand test may detect general mobility limitations. • 60-s one-leg stand may identify early decline in high-functioning adults. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether the ability to maintain one-leg standing test for varying durations (10, 30, or 60 s) is associated with physical function and fall history. 158 community-dwelling older adults participated. They performed the one-leg standing test for a maximum of 60 s and were categorized into those who could or could not maintain the position at each time point. Physical function was assessed through mobility (gait speed and five times sit-to-stand test), balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and two-step test), and knee extension strength. Fall history was self-reported. The proportions unable to maintain standing increased with test durations: 14.6 % for 10 s, 26.6 % for 30 s, and 41.1 % for 60 s. Independent t -tests showed that the maintained groups demonstrated significantly better mobility and balance performance than the non-maintained groups at each duration (all p < 0.01), and that the maintained groups at 10 s and 30 s exhibited significantly greater knee extension strength ( p < 0.01). Multiple regression analyses confirmed that the one-leg standing was independently associated with physical function outcomes. Chi-square tests revealed no significant association between standing duration and fall history. The one-leg standing test was consistently associated with physical function but showed limited ability to predict fall history. A shorter duration (10 s) effectively detected severe impairments, whereas a longer duration (60 s) was more sensitive for identifying early declines. The choice of test duration should be guided by the specific functional deficits being assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100169
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing one-leg standing test duration for screening functional decline in community-dwelling older adults

Toshimitsu Ohmine, Shuji Okuno, Akira Iwata, Keita Sasada et al.
3 citations
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
14.28
article

Optimizing one-leg standing test duration for screening functional decline in community-dwelling older adults

Toshimitsu Ohmine, Shuji Okuno, Akira Iwata, Keita Sasada, Atsuki Kanayama, Izumi Arihara, Ryoga Ueba, Saki Yamamoto, Kenichiro Tsubokura, Gaito Kitada
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• The one-leg standing test (10–60 s) was associated with mobility and balance. • The one-leg standing test, at any duration, shows no association with past-year fall history. • 10-s one-leg stand test may screen severe functional impairments. • 30-s one-leg stand test may detect general mobility limitations. • 60-s one-leg stand may identify early decline in high-functioning adults. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether the ability to maintain one-leg standing test for varying durations (10, 30, or 60 s) is associated with physical function and fall history. 158 community-dwelling older adults participated. They performed the one-leg standing test for a maximum of 60 s and were categorized into those who could or could not maintain the position at each time point. Physical function was assessed through mobility (gait speed and five times sit-to-stand test), balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and two-step test), and knee extension strength. Fall history was self-reported. The proportions unable to maintain standing increased with test durations: 14.6 % for 10 s, 26.6 % for 30 s, and 41.1 % for 60 s. Independent t -tests showed that the maintained groups demonstrated significantly better mobility and balance performance than the non-maintained groups at each duration (all p < 0.01), and that the maintained groups at 10 s and 30 s exhibited significantly greater knee extension strength ( p < 0.01). Multiple regression analyses confirmed that the one-leg standing was independently associated with physical function outcomes. Chi-square tests revealed no significant association between standing duration and fall history. The one-leg standing test was consistently associated with physical function but showed limited ability to predict fall history. A shorter duration (10 s) effectively detected severe impairments, whereas a longer duration (60 s) was more sensitive for identifying early declines. The choice of test duration should be guided by the specific functional deficits being assessed.

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics PlusVol. 2(3)
Kansai University of Welfare Sciences (JP), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Nara City Hospital (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
14.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.