A comparative study of visual outcome of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses after cataract surgery

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcome of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (IOL) and Tecnis Synergy IOL. Patients and methods This is a prospective controlled study that was performed on 40 eyes of 20 patients who were randomized into two groups (Vivity and Synergy groups), 20 eyes in each group. Uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, defocus curves, internal high-order aberrations, and modulation transfer functions were measured using iTrace aberrometer in both groups at 3 months after phacoemulsification. Results There was an improvement in the distance and intermediate visual acuity in both groups. However, the difference was statistically insignificant between the two groups ( P >0.05). On the other hand, the near visual acuity was significantly better in the Synergy group. Moreover, the visual acuity was maintained above 0.2 LogMAR from distance through near in the Synergy group, while in the Vivity group, the visual acuity was maintained at 0.1 LogMAR only in the range between 0.0 and −1.00 D with a sharp decline afterwards. The difference in the mean modulation transfer function and high-order aberrations between the two groups was statistically insignificant. Conclusion Both types of lenses demonstrated excellent distance and intermediate visual acuity. However, the near visual acuity was significantly better with the Synergy IOL. Nevertheless, both IOLs showed comparable quality of vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Delta Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/djo.djo_87_24
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of visual outcome of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses after cataract surgery

Yehia Salah, Sarah Azzam, Mohamed Hosny, Alaa Badawy et al.
Delta Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

A comparative study of visual outcome of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses after cataract surgery

Yehia Salah, Sarah Azzam, Mohamed Hosny, Alaa Badawy, Mohamed Anis
article en

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcome of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (IOL) and Tecnis Synergy IOL. Patients and methods This is a prospective controlled study that was performed on 40 eyes of 20 patients who were randomized into two groups (Vivity and Synergy groups), 20 eyes in each group. Uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, defocus curves, internal high-order aberrations, and modulation transfer functions were measured using iTrace aberrometer in both groups at 3 months after phacoemulsification. Results There was an improvement in the distance and intermediate visual acuity in both groups. However, the difference was statistically insignificant between the two groups ( P >0.05). On the other hand, the near visual acuity was significantly better in the Synergy group. Moreover, the visual acuity was maintained above 0.2 LogMAR from distance through near in the Synergy group, while in the Vivity group, the visual acuity was maintained at 0.1 LogMAR only in the range between 0.0 and −1.00 D with a sharp decline afterwards. The difference in the mean modulation transfer function and high-order aberrations between the two groups was statistically insignificant. Conclusion Both types of lenses demonstrated excellent distance and intermediate visual acuity. However, the near visual acuity was significantly better with the Synergy IOL. Nevertheless, both IOLs showed comparable quality of vision.

Delta Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 26(2)
Cairo University (EG), Helwan University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.