Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

We determined saliva cortisol concentrations (SCCs) in samples from 36 dogs using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) before and after a 10-min veterinary visit. The median cortisol concentration of the 77 samples analyzed with CLIA was 1.34 nmol/L, and the concentration of samples analyzed with LC-MS/MS was 1.30 nmol/L. With an intercept (a) of -0.06 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02) and a slope (b) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) the Passing-Bablok regression revealed that there were no significant systematic and proportional differences between the 2 methods. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was 0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.54 nmol/L) between the 2 methods. Comparing the hormone levels in the saliva of 36 dogs before and after a veterinary visit, the CLIA method had a mean difference of 0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 4.75 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.35) and the LC-MS/MS method a mean difference of 0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43 to 4.40 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.62). Comparison of cortisol changes before (<i>p</i> = 0.86) and after (<i>p =</i> 0.79) the veterinary visit revealed no differences in using either the CLIA or LC-MS/MS methods. There was also no difference in the assessment of hormone increase or decrease between CLIA (<i>p</i> = 0.72) and LC-MS/MS (<i>p</i> = 0.17). Overall, the measurement of SCC in dogs by either CLIA or LC-MS/MS provided comparable results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387251327413
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Yury Zablotski, Maike Schroers, Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg
1 citations
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Stress Responses and Cortisol
1.11
article

Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Yury Zablotski, Maike Schroers, Andrea Meyer‐Lindenberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We determined saliva cortisol concentrations (SCCs) in samples from 36 dogs using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) before and after a 10-min veterinary visit. The median cortisol concentration of the 77 samples analyzed with CLIA was 1.34 nmol/L, and the concentration of samples analyzed with LC-MS/MS was 1.30 nmol/L. With an intercept (a) of -0.06 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02) and a slope (b) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) the Passing-Bablok regression revealed that there were no significant systematic and proportional differences between the 2 methods. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was 0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.54 nmol/L) between the 2 methods. Comparing the hormone levels in the saliva of 36 dogs before and after a veterinary visit, the CLIA method had a mean difference of 0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 4.75 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.35) and the LC-MS/MS method a mean difference of 0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43 to 4.40 nmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.62). Comparison of cortisol changes before (<i>p</i> = 0.86) and after (<i>p =</i> 0.79) the veterinary visit revealed no differences in using either the CLIA or LC-MS/MS methods. There was also no difference in the assessment of hormone increase or decrease between CLIA (<i>p</i> = 0.72) and LC-MS/MS (<i>p</i> = 0.17). Overall, the measurement of SCC in dogs by either CLIA or LC-MS/MS provided comparable results.

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationVol. 37(4)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.