SICNet <sub>season</sub> V1.0: a transformer-based deep learning model for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction by incorporating sea ice thickness data

Abstract. The Arctic sea ice suffers dramatic retreat in summer and fall, which has far-reaching consequences for the global climate and commercial activities. Accurate seasonal sea ice predictions significantly infer climate change and are crucial for planning commercial activities. However, seasonal prediction of the summer sea ice encounters a significant obstacle known as the spring predictability barrier (SPB): predictions made later than the date of melt onset (roughly May) demonstrate good skill in predicting summer sea ice, while predictions made during or earlier than May exhibit considerably lower skill. This study develops a transformer-based deep learning model, SICNetseason (V1.0), to predict the Arctic sea ice concentration on a seasonal scale. Including spring sea ice thickness (SIT) data in the model significantly improves the prediction skill at the SPB point. A 20-year (2000–2019) test demonstrates that the detrended anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) of September sea ice extent (sea ice concentration &gt;15 %) predicted by our model during May and April is improved by 7.7 % and 10.61 %, respectively, compared to the ACC predicted by the state-of-the-art dynamic model SEAS5 from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Compared with the anomaly persistence benchmark, the mentioned improvement is 41.02 % and 36.33 %. Our deep learning model significantly reduces prediction errors in terms of September's sea ice concentration on seasonal scales compared to SEAS5 and the anomaly persistence model (Persistence). The spring SIT data are key in optimizing the predictions around the SPB, contributing to an enhancement in ACC of more than 20 % in September's sea ice extent (SIE) for 4- to 5-month-lead predictions. Our model achieves good generalizability in predicting the September SIE of 2020–2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2665-2025
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SICNet season V1.0: a transformer-based deep learning model for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction by incorporating sea ice thickness data

Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, Yunhe Wang
7 citations
Geoscientific model development
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
9.11
article

SICNet season V1.0: a transformer-based deep learning model for seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction by incorporating sea ice thickness data

Yibin Ren, Xiaofeng Li, Yunhe Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The Arctic sea ice suffers dramatic retreat in summer and fall, which has far-reaching consequences for the global climate and commercial activities. Accurate seasonal sea ice predictions significantly infer climate change and are crucial for planning commercial activities. However, seasonal prediction of the summer sea ice encounters a significant obstacle known as the spring predictability barrier (SPB): predictions made later than the date of melt onset (roughly May) demonstrate good skill in predicting summer sea ice, while predictions made during or earlier than May exhibit considerably lower skill. This study develops a transformer-based deep learning model, SICNetseason (V1.0), to predict the Arctic sea ice concentration on a seasonal scale. Including spring sea ice thickness (SIT) data in the model significantly improves the prediction skill at the SPB point. A 20-year (2000–2019) test demonstrates that the detrended anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) of September sea ice extent (sea ice concentration &gt;15 %) predicted by our model during May and April is improved by 7.7 % and 10.61 %, respectively, compared to the ACC predicted by the state-of-the-art dynamic model SEAS5 from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Compared with the anomaly persistence benchmark, the mentioned improvement is 41.02 % and 36.33 %. Our deep learning model significantly reduces prediction errors in terms of September's sea ice concentration on seasonal scales compared to SEAS5 and the anomaly persistence model (Persistence). The spring SIT data are key in optimizing the predictions around the SPB, contributing to an enhancement in ACC of more than 20 % in September's sea ice extent (SIE) for 4- to 5-month-lead predictions. Our model achieves good generalizability in predicting the September SIE of 2020–2023.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(9)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Oceanology (CN), First Institute of Oceanography (CN), Ocean University of China (CN)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
9.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.