A Critical Discourse Analysis of the International Community’s Statements (August 2019) on the Abrogation of Article 370 of Kashmir

On 5th August 2019, India scrapped Article 370 from its constitution, which gave Indian occupied Kashmir semi-autonomous status. This constitutional change brought Kashmir under the Union of India against the wishes of the people of Kahsmir. The international community's response to this politically significant move was ambivalent. Previous literature on the international community's response to the changed status of Kashmir is limited. The purpose of the current study is to find out the underlying meaning of the International Community’s response on the issue at hand. The study is qualitative in nature, as it aims to explore and describe the underlying meaning of the statements issued by international actors regarding the constitutional amendment on Kashmir. This research employs Norman Fairclough's 3D model as the primary tool for critical discourse analysis in this study. The result will highlight the hidden agenda in the discourse of the International Community regarding the abrogation of Article 370, which changed the status of Kashmir, and the implications of the agenda for the stakeholders involved in the Kashmir issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social science review archives.
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i2.612
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Discourse Analysis of the International Community’s Statements (August 2019) on the Abrogation of Article 370 of Kashmir

Talha Munir, Fatima Ahmed
Social science review archives.
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

A Critical Discourse Analysis of the International Community’s Statements (August 2019) on the Abrogation of Article 370 of Kashmir

Talha Munir, Fatima Ahmed
article en

Abstract

On 5th August 2019, India scrapped Article 370 from its constitution, which gave Indian occupied Kashmir semi-autonomous status. This constitutional change brought Kashmir under the Union of India against the wishes of the people of Kahsmir. The international community's response to this politically significant move was ambivalent. Previous literature on the international community's response to the changed status of Kashmir is limited. The purpose of the current study is to find out the underlying meaning of the International Community’s response on the issue at hand. The study is qualitative in nature, as it aims to explore and describe the underlying meaning of the statements issued by international actors regarding the constitutional amendment on Kashmir. This research employs Norman Fairclough's 3D model as the primary tool for critical discourse analysis in this study. The result will highlight the hidden agenda in the discourse of the International Community regarding the abrogation of Article 370, which changed the status of Kashmir, and the implications of the agenda for the stakeholders involved in the Kashmir issue.

Social science review archives.Vol. 3(2)
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK), COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.