Patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare settings: development and testing of the CAMUS and its implications

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including South Africa where limited resources and knowledge gaps exacerbate inappropriate antimicrobial use. To address this, the community antimicrobial use scale (CAMUS) was developed to assess patients’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare (PHC) settings, with the aim of informing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies. Methods Development of the CAMUS was informed by a scoping review and theoretical constructs from the Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Theory of Planned Behavior. A pilot study was subsequently conducted in two South African districts, an urban and a rural district, with 30 adult participants to provide insights into patients’ understanding of the items. Data collection involved administering CAMUS alongside a health literacy test followed by cognitive interviews to refine clarity and ensure understanding. A feasibility assessment was also conducted to evaluate the practical use of CAMUS in PHC settings. Results Participants demonstrated varied knowledge of antimicrobial use. While 60% correctly identified antibiotics as effective for bacterial infections, 93.33% incorrectly believed antibiotics could treat viral illnesses such as colds. Marginal health literacy was prevalent (86.67%). The CAMUS demonstrated feasibility, with an average completion time of 10 minutes. Questions were iteratively revised to improve future clarity and relevance based on the results of the cognitive interviews. Key findings highlighted misconceptions about antibiotics and the influence of social norms and systemic barriers on antimicrobial use behaviors. Conclusion The CAMUS effectively captures the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of antimicrobial use in South African PHC settings. Pilot testing demonstrated its feasibility to use it as a tool to assess patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in a larger population, to subsequently guide AMS initiatives by addressing knowledge gaps and related barriers to improve future antimicrobial use. Future research will include development of a shorter version of the CAMUS, followed by validation in larger, more diverse populations and in local languages to enhance its usability when investigating antimicrobial use and AMR across LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1569076
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare settings: development and testing of the CAMUS and its implications

Stephen Campbell, Mncengeli Sibanda, Tiyani Milta Sono, Johanna C. Meyer et al.
6 citations
Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
7.57
article

Patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare settings: development and testing of the CAMUS and its implications

Stephen Campbell, Mncengeli Sibanda, Tiyani Milta Sono, Johanna C. Meyer, Natalie Schellack, Nishana Ramdas, Brian Godman, Thobani Biyela, Mapula Thema
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including South Africa where limited resources and knowledge gaps exacerbate inappropriate antimicrobial use. To address this, the community antimicrobial use scale (CAMUS) was developed to assess patients’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare (PHC) settings, with the aim of informing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies. Methods Development of the CAMUS was informed by a scoping review and theoretical constructs from the Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Theory of Planned Behavior. A pilot study was subsequently conducted in two South African districts, an urban and a rural district, with 30 adult participants to provide insights into patients’ understanding of the items. Data collection involved administering CAMUS alongside a health literacy test followed by cognitive interviews to refine clarity and ensure understanding. A feasibility assessment was also conducted to evaluate the practical use of CAMUS in PHC settings. Results Participants demonstrated varied knowledge of antimicrobial use. While 60% correctly identified antibiotics as effective for bacterial infections, 93.33% incorrectly believed antibiotics could treat viral illnesses such as colds. Marginal health literacy was prevalent (86.67%). The CAMUS demonstrated feasibility, with an average completion time of 10 minutes. Questions were iteratively revised to improve future clarity and relevance based on the results of the cognitive interviews. Key findings highlighted misconceptions about antibiotics and the influence of social norms and systemic barriers on antimicrobial use behaviors. Conclusion The CAMUS effectively captures the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of antimicrobial use in South African PHC settings. Pilot testing demonstrated its feasibility to use it as a tool to assess patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in a larger population, to subsequently guide AMS initiatives by addressing knowledge gaps and related barriers to improve future antimicrobial use. Future research will include development of a shorter version of the CAMUS, followed by validation in larger, more diverse populations and in local languages to enhance its usability when investigating antimicrobial use and AMR across LMICs.

Frontiers in Tropical DiseasesVol. 6
St George's, University of London (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA), University of Manchester (GB), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
National Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
7.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.