On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm

Abstract Amidst all the hype around artificial intelligence (AI), particularly regarding large language models (LLMs), generative AI and chatbots like ChatGPT, a surge of headlines is instilling caution and even explicitly calling “bullshit” on such technologies. Should we follow suit? What exactly does it mean to call bullshit on an AI program? When is doing so a good idea, and when might it not be? With this paper, I aim to provide a brief guide on how to call bullshit on ChatGPT and related systems. In short, one must understand the basic nature of LLMs, how they function and what they produce, and one must recognize bullshit. I appeal to the prominent work of the late Harry Frankfurt and suggest that recent accounts jump too quickly to the conclusion that LLMs are bullshitting. In doing so, I offer a more level-headed approach to calling bullshit, and accordingly, a way of navigating some of the recent critiques of generative AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00743-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm

Daniel W. Tigard
4 citations
AI and Ethics
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
9.75
article

On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm

Daniel W. Tigard
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Amidst all the hype around artificial intelligence (AI), particularly regarding large language models (LLMs), generative AI and chatbots like ChatGPT, a surge of headlines is instilling caution and even explicitly calling “bullshit” on such technologies. Should we follow suit? What exactly does it mean to call bullshit on an AI program? When is doing so a good idea, and when might it not be? With this paper, I aim to provide a brief guide on how to call bullshit on ChatGPT and related systems. In short, one must understand the basic nature of LLMs, how they function and what they produce, and one must recognize bullshit. I appeal to the prominent work of the late Harry Frankfurt and suggest that recent accounts jump too quickly to the conclusion that LLMs are bullshitting. In doing so, I offer a more level-headed approach to calling bullshit, and accordingly, a way of navigating some of the recent critiques of generative AI systems.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(5)
Northeastern University (US), University of San Diego (US)
University of San Diego
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm — Daniel W. Tigard · AI and Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS