Integrating metabolomics and transcriptomics to analyze differences in muscle mass and flavor formation in Gayal and yellow cattle

Beef flavor is affected by muscle metabolites and their related regulatory genes, and the molecular regulatory mechanisms vary among different beef breeds. To provide some new ways to improve meat quality and cattle breed improvement, 24-month-old <i>Gayal</i> (<i>n</i> = 8) and yellow cattle (<i>n</i> = 8) were selected for comparison in this study. The result revealed that the longissimus dorsi muscle fiber diameter, protein content and a-value of <i>Gayal</i> were significantly higher than that of yellow cattle, but the fat content was lower than that of yellow cattle. Furthermore, <i>Gayal</i> meat contained notably higher levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and n-3PUFA than that of yellow cattle, and also had better levels of flavor amino acids (FAAs) and sweet amino acids (SAAs), which contribute to the flavor of beef. Through comprehensive analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics, we detected a total of 109 markedly different metabolites (DEMs) and 1,677 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the pectoral muscles of the two breeds. Further analysis indicated that amino acid and lipid metabolism might be the key factors contributing to the differences in meat quality and flavor between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, involving metabolites such as L-2-aminobutyric acid, L-glutamic acid, L-glutamine, L-serine, betaine, pantothenic acid, and taurine. Through correlation analysis, we identified genes highly associated with flavor amino acids (<i>GSTM3</i>, <i>GSTT2</i>), muscle development (<i>FGF10</i>, <i>EIF4EBP1</i>, <i>PPP2R2C</i>), and lipid metabolism (<i>CYP4A22</i>, <i>ACOX3</i>, <i>PLIN1</i>, <i>ADH6</i>, <i>CNDP1</i>, <i>LPAR</i>3, <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>ADIPOQ</i>, <i>FABP3</i>) related essential regulatory genes and constructed a gene-metabolite interaction network for meat quality and flavor formation in <i>Gayal</i>. In summary, it was shown that significant differences in muscle metabolites between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, especially in amino acid and lipid metabolism, may be the major reason for the differences in quality and flavor between the two types of beef. This study provides a theoretical basis for further exploring the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the differences in beef quality and flavor between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, and provides a reference for the development and genetic breeding of high-quality cattle breeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1581767
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating metabolomics and transcriptomics to analyze differences in muscle mass and flavor formation in Gayal and yellow cattle

Qian Li, Lin Han, Ye Yu, Runqi Fu et al.
3 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
3.58
article

Integrating metabolomics and transcriptomics to analyze differences in muscle mass and flavor formation in Gayal and yellow cattle

Qian Li, Lin Han, Ye Yu, Runqi Fu, Min Qi, Shengyong Mao, Chunjia Jin, Huan Gao, Jiawei Zhang, Jing Leng, Binlong Fu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Beef flavor is affected by muscle metabolites and their related regulatory genes, and the molecular regulatory mechanisms vary among different beef breeds. To provide some new ways to improve meat quality and cattle breed improvement, 24-month-old <i>Gayal</i> (<i>n</i> = 8) and yellow cattle (<i>n</i> = 8) were selected for comparison in this study. The result revealed that the longissimus dorsi muscle fiber diameter, protein content and a-value of <i>Gayal</i> were significantly higher than that of yellow cattle, but the fat content was lower than that of yellow cattle. Furthermore, <i>Gayal</i> meat contained notably higher levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and n-3PUFA than that of yellow cattle, and also had better levels of flavor amino acids (FAAs) and sweet amino acids (SAAs), which contribute to the flavor of beef. Through comprehensive analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics, we detected a total of 109 markedly different metabolites (DEMs) and 1,677 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the pectoral muscles of the two breeds. Further analysis indicated that amino acid and lipid metabolism might be the key factors contributing to the differences in meat quality and flavor between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, involving metabolites such as L-2-aminobutyric acid, L-glutamic acid, L-glutamine, L-serine, betaine, pantothenic acid, and taurine. Through correlation analysis, we identified genes highly associated with flavor amino acids (<i>GSTM3</i>, <i>GSTT2</i>), muscle development (<i>FGF10</i>, <i>EIF4EBP1</i>, <i>PPP2R2C</i>), and lipid metabolism (<i>CYP4A22</i>, <i>ACOX3</i>, <i>PLIN1</i>, <i>ADH6</i>, <i>CNDP1</i>, <i>LPAR</i>3, <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>ADIPOQ</i>, <i>FABP3</i>) related essential regulatory genes and constructed a gene-metabolite interaction network for meat quality and flavor formation in <i>Gayal</i>. In summary, it was shown that significant differences in muscle metabolites between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, especially in amino acid and lipid metabolism, may be the major reason for the differences in quality and flavor between the two types of beef. This study provides a theoretical basis for further exploring the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the differences in beef quality and flavor between <i>Gayal</i> and yellow cattle, and provides a reference for the development and genetic breeding of high-quality cattle breeds.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Yunnan Agricultural University (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanjing Agricultural University, Yunnan Agricultural University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.