Redefining assessment for sustainability: a reflective approach to curriculum transformation in environmental education

Background The urgency of sustainability challenges has reinforced the need for effective environmental education in higher education. However, certain assessment methods often fail to balance theoretical depth with individual accountability. The shift toward digital and hybrid learning post-COVID-19 further necessitates adaptive, student-centered assessment models. Objectives This study critically evaluates assessment practices within the Environmental Sustainability (EVST) module at a University of Technology in South Africa. It identifies key limitations in project-based assessments and proposes a revised framework integrating diverse formative and summative strategies to enhance engagement and real-world application. Methods Using Schön’s reflective practitioner model, the study draws on teaching experiences, collegial discussions, and professional development insights. It critiques past assessment methods and introduces an alternative approach based on formative and summative assessment theories, constructive alignment, and student-centered learning. The revised model incorporates technology-driven quizzes, individual essays, and structured group projects to provide a more balanced evaluation that takes cognizance of modern digital realities. Results The findings indicate that technology-driven quizzes enhance digital literacy and real-time feedback, individual essays improve research and analytical skills, and structured group projects foster collaboration while ensuring equitable participation. The revised model aligns with the university’s graduate attributes by promoting problem-solving, self-directed learning, and environmental responsibility. Conclusion This study underscores the need for continuous assessment refinement in environmental education, particularly in digital learning environments. By integrating adaptive assessment methods, educators can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical sustainability action, fostering critical thinking and engagement. The proposed framework offers a model for curriculum transformation and future research on assessment strategies

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1553999
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
62.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining assessment for sustainability: a reflective approach to curriculum transformation in environmental education

James Ojochenemi David
7 citations
Frontiers in Education
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
62.48
article

Redefining assessment for sustainability: a reflective approach to curriculum transformation in environmental education

James Ojochenemi David
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Background The urgency of sustainability challenges has reinforced the need for effective environmental education in higher education. However, certain assessment methods often fail to balance theoretical depth with individual accountability. The shift toward digital and hybrid learning post-COVID-19 further necessitates adaptive, student-centered assessment models. Objectives This study critically evaluates assessment practices within the Environmental Sustainability (EVST) module at a University of Technology in South Africa. It identifies key limitations in project-based assessments and proposes a revised framework integrating diverse formative and summative strategies to enhance engagement and real-world application. Methods Using Schön’s reflective practitioner model, the study draws on teaching experiences, collegial discussions, and professional development insights. It critiques past assessment methods and introduces an alternative approach based on formative and summative assessment theories, constructive alignment, and student-centered learning. The revised model incorporates technology-driven quizzes, individual essays, and structured group projects to provide a more balanced evaluation that takes cognizance of modern digital realities. Results The findings indicate that technology-driven quizzes enhance digital literacy and real-time feedback, individual essays improve research and analytical skills, and structured group projects foster collaboration while ensuring equitable participation. The revised model aligns with the university’s graduate attributes by promoting problem-solving, self-directed learning, and environmental responsibility. Conclusion This study underscores the need for continuous assessment refinement in environmental education, particularly in digital learning environments. By integrating adaptive assessment methods, educators can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical sustainability action, fostering critical thinking and engagement. The proposed framework offers a model for curriculum transformation and future research on assessment strategies

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
62.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.