CO <sub>2</sub> seepage behaviour in coal under different stress and water content conditions

Understanding CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal beds is crucial for effective geological CO 2 storage. This study explores CO 2 seepage characteristics in coal samples under varying stress conditions (axial, confining and gas pressures) and water content through laboratory tests, theoretical analysis and mathematical modelling. Increasing axial and confining pressures compresses the original pores and cracks in the coal, leading to a gradual reduction in CO 2 seepage. At low gas pressures values, the slip effect impacts permeability; however, as gas pressures increases from 3 to 4 MPa, the higher pressure reduces this effect, increasing CO 2 permeability by c . 300%. The water content also significantly influences permeability, with dry samples showing the highest permeability and water-saturated samples the lowest. The direction of confining pressure, perpendicular to the seepage flow, obstructs gas seepage channels more effectively, making confining pressure the most strongly correlated factor with seepage discharge (correlation coefficient of 0.72). Based on the regression fitting and neural network analysis of experimental data, a permeability model ( R 2 = 0.92) was developed, providing accurate predictions of CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal under various conditions and serving as a valuable numerical reference for similar studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2024-099
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geoscience and Mining Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal under different stress and water content conditions

Ziyang Xiong, Chenxi Liu, Dongming Zhang, Chongyang Wang et al.
2 citations
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Geoscience and Mining Technology
2.61
article

CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal under different stress and water content conditions

Ziyang Xiong, Chenxi Liu, Dongming Zhang, Chongyang Wang, Y. Pan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal beds is crucial for effective geological CO 2 storage. This study explores CO 2 seepage characteristics in coal samples under varying stress conditions (axial, confining and gas pressures) and water content through laboratory tests, theoretical analysis and mathematical modelling. Increasing axial and confining pressures compresses the original pores and cracks in the coal, leading to a gradual reduction in CO 2 seepage. At low gas pressures values, the slip effect impacts permeability; however, as gas pressures increases from 3 to 4 MPa, the higher pressure reduces this effect, increasing CO 2 permeability by c . 300%. The water content also significantly influences permeability, with dry samples showing the highest permeability and water-saturated samples the lowest. The direction of confining pressure, perpendicular to the seepage flow, obstructs gas seepage channels more effectively, making confining pressure the most strongly correlated factor with seepage discharge (correlation coefficient of 0.72). Based on the regression fitting and neural network analysis of experimental data, a permeability model ( R 2 = 0.92) was developed, providing accurate predictions of CO 2 seepage behaviour in coal under various conditions and serving as a valuable numerical reference for similar studies.

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and HydrogeologyVol. 58(3)
Chongqing University (CN), Politecnico di Torino (IT), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), RS Dynamics (Czechia) (CZ), Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (US), State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Geoscience and Mining Technology
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.