Abstracting general syntax for XAI after decomposing explanation sub-components

Abstract Healthcare providers, policymakers, and defense contractors need to understand many types of machine learning model behaviors. While eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) provides tools for interpreting these behaviors, few frameworks, surveys, and taxonomies produce succinct yet general notation to help researchers and practitioners describe their explainability needs and quantify whether these needs are met. Such quantified comparisons could help individuals rank XAI methods by their relevance to use-cases, select explanations best suited for individual users, and evaluate what explanations are most useful for describing model behaviors. This paper collects, decomposes, and abstracts subcomponents of common XAI methods to identify a mathematically grounded syntax that applies generally to describing modern and future explanation types while remaining useful for discovering novel XAI methods . The resulting syntax, introduced as the Qi -Framework, generally defines explanation types in terms of the information being explained, their utility to inspectors, and the methods and information used to produce explanations. Just as programming languages define syntax to structure, simplify, and standardize software development, so too the Qi -Framework acts as a common language to help researchers and practitioners select, compare, and discover XAI methods. Derivative works may extend and implement the Qi -Framework to develop a more rigorous science for interpretable machine learning and inspire collaborative competition across XAI research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11216-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstracting general syntax for XAI after decomposing explanation sub-components

Olivia P. Dizon-Paradis, Damon L. Woodard, Stephen Wormald, Matheus Kunzler Maldaner et al.
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
article

Abstracting general syntax for XAI after decomposing explanation sub-components

Olivia P. Dizon-Paradis, Damon L. Woodard, Stephen Wormald, Matheus Kunzler Maldaner, Kristian D. O’Connor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Healthcare providers, policymakers, and defense contractors need to understand many types of machine learning model behaviors. While eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) provides tools for interpreting these behaviors, few frameworks, surveys, and taxonomies produce succinct yet general notation to help researchers and practitioners describe their explainability needs and quantify whether these needs are met. Such quantified comparisons could help individuals rank XAI methods by their relevance to use-cases, select explanations best suited for individual users, and evaluate what explanations are most useful for describing model behaviors. This paper collects, decomposes, and abstracts subcomponents of common XAI methods to identify a mathematically grounded syntax that applies generally to describing modern and future explanation types while remaining useful for discovering novel XAI methods . The resulting syntax, introduced as the Qi -Framework, generally defines explanation types in terms of the information being explained, their utility to inspectors, and the methods and information used to produce explanations. Just as programming languages define syntax to structure, simplify, and standardize software development, so too the Qi -Framework acts as a common language to help researchers and practitioners select, compare, and discover XAI methods. Derivative works may extend and implement the Qi -Framework to develop a more rigorous science for interpretable machine learning and inspire collaborative competition across XAI research.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(8)
University of Florida (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.