Political Partisanship Correlates With Attitudes of South Dakota Nurses Toward Flu and COVID‐19 Vaccination Mandates for Healthcare Workers

ABSTRACT Mandatory vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs) became a contested issue during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We examined the attitudes of South Dakota nurses toward mandatory flu and COVID‐19 vaccination for HCWs in the post‐pandemic period. Using contact information from the state regulatory body, we emailed nurses in South Dakota to complete an online survey in May 2024. We used descriptive and multivariate analysis to assess the correlates of attitudes toward the two vaccine mandates. We found that the support for a flu vaccination mandate for HCWs was higher than for a COVID‐19 vaccination mandate. Among the 1763 participants, 32% supported mandatory COVID‐19 vaccination and 57% supported mandatory flu vaccination for HCWs. Regression results showed that support for both mandates was associated with COVID‐19 vaccination status, flu vaccination status, and partisan self‐identification. Public health administrators and employers should be mindful of these issues as they design policies to increase vaccine uptake among nurses and other HCWs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Medical & Health Policy
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.70020
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Partisanship Correlates With Attitudes of South Dakota Nurses Toward Flu and COVID‐19 Vaccination Mandates for Healthcare Workers

Thomas E. Stenvig, Filip Viskupič, David L. Wiltse
World Medical & Health Policy
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Political Partisanship Correlates With Attitudes of South Dakota Nurses Toward Flu and COVID‐19 Vaccination Mandates for Healthcare Workers

Thomas E. Stenvig, Filip Viskupič, David L. Wiltse
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mandatory vaccination for healthcare workers (HCWs) became a contested issue during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We examined the attitudes of South Dakota nurses toward mandatory flu and COVID‐19 vaccination for HCWs in the post‐pandemic period. Using contact information from the state regulatory body, we emailed nurses in South Dakota to complete an online survey in May 2024. We used descriptive and multivariate analysis to assess the correlates of attitudes toward the two vaccine mandates. We found that the support for a flu vaccination mandate for HCWs was higher than for a COVID‐19 vaccination mandate. Among the 1763 participants, 32% supported mandatory COVID‐19 vaccination and 57% supported mandatory flu vaccination for HCWs. Regression results showed that support for both mandates was associated with COVID‐19 vaccination status, flu vaccination status, and partisan self‐identification. Public health administrators and employers should be mindful of these issues as they design policies to increase vaccine uptake among nurses and other HCWs.

World Medical & Health PolicyVol. 17(3)
Iowa State University (US), South Dakota State University (US)
Iowa State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.