Exploring critical issues for local sustainability assessment through community participation

Despite several initiatives in local sustainability assessment, there remains a lack of knowledge on how to balance an assessment that considers multiple aspects while also focusing on specific critical issues of local sustainability. The primary goal of this research is to explore how a subset of ‘technical’ and ‘voluntary’ indicators can be co-developed to assess critical local sustainability issues. To this end, a participatory approach was employed with the communities of three local case studies in Brazil where solid waste was a critical issue for local sustainability. The results indicate that the co-developed goals and indicators effectively address critical sustainability issues. They also show that voluntary indicators were able to capture in-depth, context-specific problems and were more user-friendly. Due to these characteristics, we argue that they may be more suitable for citizen monitoring. Overall, this study highlights that technical and voluntary indicators developed through community participation enhance their relevance and usability for local sustainability assessments. • Standardized indicator sets fail to capture the concerns of local communities. • Voluntary indicators scored higher than technical ones in all three case studies. • Community members preferred indicators aligned with their everyday experiences. • Critical local sustainability issues require more in-depth indicator sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100718
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring critical issues for local sustainability assessment through community participation

Sylmara Francelino Lopes Gonçalves-Dias, Natália Molina Cetrulo, Tiago Balieiro Cetrulo, Tomás B. Ramos
2 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
4.84
article

Exploring critical issues for local sustainability assessment through community participation

Sylmara Francelino Lopes Gonçalves-Dias, Natália Molina Cetrulo, Tiago Balieiro Cetrulo, Tomás B. Ramos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite several initiatives in local sustainability assessment, there remains a lack of knowledge on how to balance an assessment that considers multiple aspects while also focusing on specific critical issues of local sustainability. The primary goal of this research is to explore how a subset of ‘technical’ and ‘voluntary’ indicators can be co-developed to assess critical local sustainability issues. To this end, a participatory approach was employed with the communities of three local case studies in Brazil where solid waste was a critical issue for local sustainability. The results indicate that the co-developed goals and indicators effectively address critical sustainability issues. They also show that voluntary indicators were able to capture in-depth, context-specific problems and were more user-friendly. Due to these characteristics, we argue that they may be more suitable for citizen monitoring. Overall, this study highlights that technical and voluntary indicators developed through community participation enhance their relevance and usability for local sustainability assessments. • Standardized indicator sets fail to capture the concerns of local communities. • Voluntary indicators scored higher than technical ones in all three case studies. • Community members preferred indicators aligned with their everyday experiences. • Critical local sustainability issues require more in-depth indicator sets.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 27
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.