Benchmarking Vision Transformers for Satellite Image Classification based on Data Augmentation Techniques

This article evaluates the implications on transformer model performance in satellite image classification by means of numerous data augmentation techniques using the Eurosat dataset. We examine the Swin-tiny, Swin-small, Convit-small, and Crossvit-small models under several augmentation methods including MixUp, CutMix, Geometric, WGP-GAN, and DCGAN. Our findings demonstrate that Mixup and WGP-GAN augmentations significantly enhance model performance; Swin small achieves 99.26% test accuracy the best. CutMix was more helpful for Swin-small than for Swin-tiny; geometric augmentation improved Swin-tiny and Crossvit-small. DCGAN behaved differently on many models. These results highlight the significance of selecting appropriate augmentation techniques suited for certain model architectures to increase performance in assignments needing satellite image classification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and its Applications
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15849/ijasca.250330.06
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Vision Transformers for Satellite Image Classification based on Data Augmentation Techniques

Enas Ali Mohammed, Amir Lakizadeh
2 citations
International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and its Applications
Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications
4.96
article

Benchmarking Vision Transformers for Satellite Image Classification based on Data Augmentation Techniques

Enas Ali Mohammed, Amir Lakizadeh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article evaluates the implications on transformer model performance in satellite image classification by means of numerous data augmentation techniques using the Eurosat dataset. We examine the Swin-tiny, Swin-small, Convit-small, and Crossvit-small models under several augmentation methods including MixUp, CutMix, Geometric, WGP-GAN, and DCGAN. Our findings demonstrate that Mixup and WGP-GAN augmentations significantly enhance model performance; Swin small achieves 99.26% test accuracy the best. CutMix was more helpful for Swin-small than for Swin-tiny; geometric augmentation improved Swin-tiny and Crossvit-small. DCGAN behaved differently on many models. These results highlight the significance of selecting appropriate augmentation techniques suited for certain model architectures to increase performance in assignments needing satellite image classification.

International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and its ApplicationsVol. 17(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.