“INEVITABILITY”: Capturing Strategic Ambiguity in Xi Jinping's China

ABSTRACT This article approaches the discourse of inevitability used by Xi Jinping and his foreign policy communicators from the perspective of strategic ambiguity signaling. Drawing on the post‐realist rhetoric turn, it analyzes its roots, evolution, as well as the contexts in which Xi Jinping deploys it, most notably in relation to the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” and its element of “resolving the Taiwan question and realizing China's complete reunification.” Centering on official English translations, I examine the original texts in Chinese to establish the Chinese equivalents of wording where viable. I show that the inevitability discourse projects assurance yet fails to provide detail or indicate a preference of one scenario (peaceful unification) over any other (takeover by force), indicating that it falls within a conceptualization of strategic ambiguity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Affairs
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12076
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“INEVITABILITY”: Capturing Strategic Ambiguity in Xi Jinping's China

Una Aleksandra Bērziņa‐Čerenkova
World Affairs
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

“INEVITABILITY”: Capturing Strategic Ambiguity in Xi Jinping's China

Una Aleksandra Bērziņa‐Čerenkova
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article approaches the discourse of inevitability used by Xi Jinping and his foreign policy communicators from the perspective of strategic ambiguity signaling. Drawing on the post‐realist rhetoric turn, it analyzes its roots, evolution, as well as the contexts in which Xi Jinping deploys it, most notably in relation to the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” and its element of “resolving the Taiwan question and realizing China's complete reunification.” Centering on official English translations, I examine the original texts in Chinese to establish the Chinese equivalents of wording where viable. I show that the inevitability discourse projects assurance yet fails to provide detail or indicate a preference of one scenario (peaceful unification) over any other (takeover by force), indicating that it falls within a conceptualization of strategic ambiguity.

World AffairsVol. 188(2)
King's College London (GB), Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“INEVITABILITY”: Capturing Strategic Ambiguity in Xi Jinping's China — Una Aleksandra Bērziņa‐Čerenkova · World Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS