Comparative Study of Illustration Design in Chinese and Japanese Mathematics Textbooks Using the Parallel Lines Units as an Example

In this paper, the "Parallel Lines" unit in the seventh grade mathematics textbooks of Zhejiang Education Press and the eighth grade mathematics textbooks in Japan are considered. Kim's textbook illustration quality analysis framework is used to examine the distribution and quality differences between junior high school mathematics textbook illustrations in China and Japan. The paper first analyzes the quantity distribution of the four types of illustrations in both textbooks, namely, illustrations of the history of mathematics, mathematical illustrations, physical scene diagram class illustration and decorative diagram class illustration. Then, it quantitatively compares the accuracy, relevance, conciseness and contextuality of the illustrations through the F test method, and further discusses the differences of Mathematics education concepts reflected in the illustration design under different cultural backgrounds. The results show that Chinese textbooks include some illustrations related to the history of mathematics, has a significantly higher number of real-world context illustrations compared to the Japanese textbooks, and scores higher in contextualization. In contrast, Japanese textbooks feature more decorative illustrations and demonstrates stronger relevance between illustrations and mathematical content. These findings reveal the differences in illustration design between the two countries’ textbooks, provide a new perspective for understanding mathematical education philosophies in different cultural contexts, and offer valuable insights for textbook development practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i51964
Primary Topic
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Illustration Design in Chinese and Japanese Mathematics Textbooks Using the Parallel Lines Units as an Example

Yang Zhan, Lixia Ye, Junfeng Ma, Keng-Ting Cheng
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
article

Comparative Study of Illustration Design in Chinese and Japanese Mathematics Textbooks Using the Parallel Lines Units as an Example

Yang Zhan, Lixia Ye, Junfeng Ma, Keng-Ting Cheng
article en

Abstract

In this paper, the "Parallel Lines" unit in the seventh grade mathematics textbooks of Zhejiang Education Press and the eighth grade mathematics textbooks in Japan are considered. Kim's textbook illustration quality analysis framework is used to examine the distribution and quality differences between junior high school mathematics textbook illustrations in China and Japan. The paper first analyzes the quantity distribution of the four types of illustrations in both textbooks, namely, illustrations of the history of mathematics, mathematical illustrations, physical scene diagram class illustration and decorative diagram class illustration. Then, it quantitatively compares the accuracy, relevance, conciseness and contextuality of the illustrations through the F test method, and further discusses the differences of Mathematics education concepts reflected in the illustration design under different cultural backgrounds. The results show that Chinese textbooks include some illustrations related to the history of mathematics, has a significantly higher number of real-world context illustrations compared to the Japanese textbooks, and scores higher in contextualization. In contrast, Japanese textbooks feature more decorative illustrations and demonstrates stronger relevance between illustrations and mathematical content. These findings reveal the differences in illustration design between the two countries’ textbooks, provide a new perspective for understanding mathematical education philosophies in different cultural contexts, and offer valuable insights for textbook development practices.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.