Benchmark CCSD(T) and Density Functional Theory Calculations of Biologically Relevant Catecholic Systems

Approximate complete basis set CCSD(T), MP2, and HF calculations are performed for thirty-two catechol-containing complexes. These complexes, which include metal-coordination, hydrogen-bonding, π-stacking, and other, weaker interactions, are representative of the types of noncovalent interactions that catechols undergo when binding to proteins in the body, such as in the biosynthesis of dopamine. The catechols studied include the neutral catechol and dinitrocatechol molecules, as well as the charged dopamine and DOPAC molecules. Calculations with twenty-one density functional theory methods with triple and quadruple-ζ basis sets are evaluated against the CCSD(T) benchmarks to ascertain their accuracy. It is found that MN15, M06-2X-D3, ωB97XD, ωB97M-V, and CAM-B3LYP-D3 provide good accuracy when compared with CCSD(T)/CBS calculations for these systems and may be used for the study of relevant biological systems. The local DPLNO CCSD(T) method is also evaluated against the CCSD(T)/CBS energies for a subset of the complexes and found to agree within 1-3%, with a maximum difference of 0.26 kcal/mol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c08356
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmark CCSD(T) and Density Functional Theory Calculations of Biologically Relevant Catecholic Systems

Mauricio Cafiero, Joshua Harle
7 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
article

Benchmark CCSD(T) and Density Functional Theory Calculations of Biologically Relevant Catecholic Systems

Mauricio Cafiero, Joshua Harle
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Approximate complete basis set CCSD(T), MP2, and HF calculations are performed for thirty-two catechol-containing complexes. These complexes, which include metal-coordination, hydrogen-bonding, π-stacking, and other, weaker interactions, are representative of the types of noncovalent interactions that catechols undergo when binding to proteins in the body, such as in the biosynthesis of dopamine. The catechols studied include the neutral catechol and dinitrocatechol molecules, as well as the charged dopamine and DOPAC molecules. Calculations with twenty-one density functional theory methods with triple and quadruple-ζ basis sets are evaluated against the CCSD(T) benchmarks to ascertain their accuracy. It is found that MN15, M06-2X-D3, ωB97XD, ωB97M-V, and CAM-B3LYP-D3 provide good accuracy when compared with CCSD(T)/CBS calculations for these systems and may be used for the study of relevant biological systems. The local DPLNO CCSD(T) method is also evaluated against the CCSD(T)/CBS energies for a subset of the complexes and found to agree within 1-3%, with a maximum difference of 0.26 kcal/mol.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry BVol. 129(20)
University of Reading (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Royal Society of Chemistry
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.