Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society

Abstract Good governance of AI-supported public services means that they should function in a democratic and rule-of-law manner (“good order”) and consider the just treatment and wellbeing of citizens (“good society”). To gain insight into relevant “good order” and “good society” values, this study uses AI ethics and public administration literature to develop a comprehensive value framework for the good governance of public sector AI. We identify values pivotal to the AI-public sector nexus through a dual-phase analysis. First, we identify seven core values: five “good order” core values (responsiveness, effectiveness, procedural justice, resilience, and counterbalance) and two “good society” core values (wellbeing, social justice). Subsequently, delving into 33 studies spanning AI ethics and public administration, we identify operational values related to the core values. The operational values provide further interpretation of the core values and operationalize them. This second round in our research also shows that the seven core values found during the first round indeed account for value considerations encountered by scholars so far. In this way, we arrive at a robust value framework for the good governance of AI use in the public sector. The framework is not a one-size-fits-all recipe for public sector AI but a guide for policymakers to consider both democratic and ethical values. It can address gaps in both research fields, analyze moral dilemmas in AI policy tools like public-private partnerships, and aid policymakers in blending abstract values with contextual decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society

Jana Mišić, Rinie van Est, Linda Kool
5 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society

Jana Mišić, Rinie van Est, Linda Kool
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Good governance of AI-supported public services means that they should function in a democratic and rule-of-law manner (“good order”) and consider the just treatment and wellbeing of citizens (“good society”). To gain insight into relevant “good order” and “good society” values, this study uses AI ethics and public administration literature to develop a comprehensive value framework for the good governance of public sector AI. We identify values pivotal to the AI-public sector nexus through a dual-phase analysis. First, we identify seven core values: five “good order” core values (responsiveness, effectiveness, procedural justice, resilience, and counterbalance) and two “good society” core values (wellbeing, social justice). Subsequently, delving into 33 studies spanning AI ethics and public administration, we identify operational values related to the core values. The operational values provide further interpretation of the core values and operationalize them. This second round in our research also shows that the seven core values found during the first round indeed account for value considerations encountered by scholars so far. In this way, we arrive at a robust value framework for the good governance of AI use in the public sector. The framework is not a one-size-fits-all recipe for public sector AI but a guide for policymakers to consider both democratic and ethical values. It can address gaps in both research fields, analyze moral dilemmas in AI policy tools like public-private partnerships, and aid policymakers in blending abstract values with contextual decision-making.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(5)
Rathenau Instituut (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.