A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Heart Disease Diagnosis Using a Comprehensive Patient Cohort

Early and accurate detection of Heart Disease (HD) is critical for improving patient outcomes, as HD remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Timely and precise prediction can aid in preventive interventions, reducing fatal risks associated with misdiagnosis. Machine learning (ML) models have gained significant attention in healthcare for their ability to assist professionals in diagnosing diseases with high accuracy. This study utilizes 918 instances from publicly available UCI and Kaggle datasets to develop and compare the performance of various ML models, including Adaptive Boosting (AB), Naïve Bayes (NB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Bagging, and Logistic Regression (LR). Before model training, data preprocessing techniques such as handling missing values, outlier detection using Isolation Forest, and feature scaling were applied to improve model performance. The evaluation was conducted using performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Among the tested models, XGB demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.34% and an F1-score of 95.19%, surpassing other models and previous studies in HD prediction. LR closely followed with an accuracy of 93.08% and an F1-score of 93.99%, indicating competitive performance. In contrast, NB exhibited the lowest performance, with an accuracy of 88.05% and an F1-score of 89.02%, highlighting its limitations in handling complex patterns within the dataset. Although ML models show superior performance as compared to previous studies, some limitations exist, including the use of publicly available datasets, which may not fully capture real-world clinical variations, and the lack of feature selection techniques, which could impact model interpretability and robustness. Despite these limitations, the findings highlight the potential of ML-based frameworks for accurate and efficient HD detection, demonstrating their value as decision-support tools in clinical settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.065423
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Heart Disease Diagnosis Using a Comprehensive Patient Cohort

Neelam Gohar, Dawar Awan, Saadia Tabassum, Amal Al‐Rasheed et al.
2 citations
Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
5.88
article

A Machine Learning-Based Framework for Heart Disease Diagnosis Using a Comprehensive Patient Cohort

Neelam Gohar, Dawar Awan, Saadia Tabassum, Amal Al‐Rasheed, Shahid Khan, Fazal Muhammad, Muhammad Uzair Khan, Muhammad Ayaz Khan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Early and accurate detection of Heart Disease (HD) is critical for improving patient outcomes, as HD remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Timely and precise prediction can aid in preventive interventions, reducing fatal risks associated with misdiagnosis. Machine learning (ML) models have gained significant attention in healthcare for their ability to assist professionals in diagnosing diseases with high accuracy. This study utilizes 918 instances from publicly available UCI and Kaggle datasets to develop and compare the performance of various ML models, including Adaptive Boosting (AB), Naïve Bayes (NB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Bagging, and Logistic Regression (LR). Before model training, data preprocessing techniques such as handling missing values, outlier detection using Isolation Forest, and feature scaling were applied to improve model performance. The evaluation was conducted using performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Among the tested models, XGB demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.34% and an F1-score of 95.19%, surpassing other models and previous studies in HD prediction. LR closely followed with an accuracy of 93.08% and an F1-score of 93.99%, indicating competitive performance. In contrast, NB exhibited the lowest performance, with an accuracy of 88.05% and an F1-score of 89.02%, highlighting its limitations in handling complex patterns within the dataset. Although ML models show superior performance as compared to previous studies, some limitations exist, including the use of publicly available datasets, which may not fully capture real-world clinical variations, and the lack of feature selection techniques, which could impact model interpretability and robustness. Despite these limitations, the findings highlight the potential of ML-based frameworks for accurate and efficient HD detection, demonstrating their value as decision-support tools in clinical settings.

Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print)Vol. 84(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.