Preregistration: What’s (not) to like?

Preregistration offers researchers a way to improve transparency and rigor, yet its adoption varies across fields. Exploring its benefits, limitations, and common challenges can provide valuable insights for those considering its implementation in diverse research contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/1192f2f8.24369787
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preregistration: What’s (not) to like?

Laura Luyten
European and International Law Studies
article

Preregistration: What’s (not) to like?

Laura Luyten
article en

Abstract

Preregistration offers researchers a way to improve transparency and rigor, yet its adoption varies across fields. Exploring its benefits, limitations, and common challenges can provide valuable insights for those considering its implementation in diverse research contexts.

KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
European and International Law Studies
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preregistration: What’s (not) to like? — Laura Luyten · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS