Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study Comparing Ultra-High-Risk and Other Risk Groups

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with ultra-high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) compared to those with low-risk and high-risk GTN. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for GTN patients treated at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, between January 1999 and December 2019. Overall and risk-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. <b>Results</b>: During the study period, 160 patients with GTN were identified, including 98 (61.2%) classified as low-risk, 31 (19.4%) as high-risk, and 31 (19.4%) as ultra-high-risk. One patient in the low-risk group and one in the high-risk group underwent hysterectomy without adjuvant chemotherapy due to spontaneous regression of serum β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin). Additionally, one patient with ultra-high-risk GTN died before receiving chemotherapy. Among the 97 low-risk GTN patients, 80 (82.5%) were treated with either single-agent methotrexate or actinomycin D. Among the 30 high-risk GTN patients, 20 (66.7%) received EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine) as first-line chemotherapy, while 24 (80%) of the 30 ultra-high-risk GTN patients received EMA/CO as first-line treatment. Following first-line chemotherapy and/or salvage treatment, patients with ultra-high-risk GTN had significantly worse outcomes compared with those with low- and high-risk GTN, with remission rates of 63.3%, 96.9%, and 80.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The five-year overall survival rate for patients with ultra-high-risk GTN was significantly lower than that for patients with low- and high-risk GTN (56% vs. 96% and 80%, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, significant prognostic factors included antecedent term pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.56-37.22; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and brain metastasis (HR = 4.61; 95% CI, 1.73-12.28; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: Ultra-high-risk GTN accounts for only a small proportion of GTN cases but it is associated with poor survival rate and responsible for the majority of GTN-related deaths. Antecedent term pregnancy and brain metastasis were identified as significant prognostic factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101655
Primary Topic
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study Comparing Ultra-High-Risk and Other Risk Groups

Theera Tongsong, Prapaporn Suprasert, Atita Ruengsaen, Sethawat Sethasathien et al.
3 links
Cancers
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
article

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study Comparing Ultra-High-Risk and Other Risk Groups

Theera Tongsong, Prapaporn Suprasert, Atita Ruengsaen, Sethawat Sethasathien, Kittipat Charoenkwan, Charuwan Tantipalakorn, Jatupol Srisomboon
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with ultra-high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) compared to those with low-risk and high-risk GTN. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for GTN patients treated at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, between January 1999 and December 2019. Overall and risk-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. <b>Results</b>: During the study period, 160 patients with GTN were identified, including 98 (61.2%) classified as low-risk, 31 (19.4%) as high-risk, and 31 (19.4%) as ultra-high-risk. One patient in the low-risk group and one in the high-risk group underwent hysterectomy without adjuvant chemotherapy due to spontaneous regression of serum β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin). Additionally, one patient with ultra-high-risk GTN died before receiving chemotherapy. Among the 97 low-risk GTN patients, 80 (82.5%) were treated with either single-agent methotrexate or actinomycin D. Among the 30 high-risk GTN patients, 20 (66.7%) received EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine) as first-line chemotherapy, while 24 (80%) of the 30 ultra-high-risk GTN patients received EMA/CO as first-line treatment. Following first-line chemotherapy and/or salvage treatment, patients with ultra-high-risk GTN had significantly worse outcomes compared with those with low- and high-risk GTN, with remission rates of 63.3%, 96.9%, and 80.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The five-year overall survival rate for patients with ultra-high-risk GTN was significantly lower than that for patients with low- and high-risk GTN (56% vs. 96% and 80%, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, significant prognostic factors included antecedent term pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.56-37.22; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and brain metastasis (HR = 4.61; 95% CI, 1.73-12.28; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: Ultra-high-risk GTN accounts for only a small proportion of GTN cases but it is associated with poor survival rate and responsible for the majority of GTN-related deaths. Antecedent term pregnancy and brain metastasis were identified as significant prognostic factors.

CancersVol. 17(10)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.