Complementary <i>in situ</i> garnet Lu-Hf geochronology and monazite U(-Th)-Pb petrochronology: an example from the Archean Slave craton, Northwest Territories, Canada

Abstract Advances in analytical instrumentation over the past decade have facilitated the development of new geochronological methods. In particular, the triple quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers with in-line reaction cells have made it possible to investigate beta decay geochronological systems, including Lu-Hf in garnet, in situ via laser ablation. While these new methods allow different kinds of studies to be carried out, their utility relative to well-established methods has not been investigated in detail. Herein we present the results of in situ garnet Lu-Hf and monazite U(-Th)-Pb geochronological analyses of two adjacent Archean meta-pelitic rocks from the Northwest Territories, Canada. Whereas the garnet Lu-Hf analyses define single population isochrons of ca. 2570 Ma, monazite U(-Th)-Pb analyses define two chemically distinct populations. An older ca. 2570 Ma monazite population has low Y concentrations, while a younger, ca. 2530 Ma monazite population has high Y concentrations. The change in Y concentrations in the monazite is consistent with coeveal growth with garnet during prograde metamorphism whereas the younger high Y monazite is interpreted to reflect growth during garnet breakdown during decompression. The results presented herein demonstrate that incorporating both in situ garnet and monazite geochronological data takes advantage of each method (i.e. the spatial precision, variable (re)crystalization under different conditions, and the ability to determine a date without relying on an isochron for monazite U-Pb, and the ability to date a primary metamorphic phase for garnet Lu-Hf) to build a more robust geochronological history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Magazine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s001675682500007x
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complementary in situ garnet Lu-Hf geochronology and monazite U(-Th)-Pb petrochronology: an example from the Archean Slave craton, Northwest Territories, Canada

Brendan Dyck, Kyle Patrick Larson, John M. Cottle, Rebecca Canam et al.
Geological Magazine
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Complementary in situ garnet Lu-Hf geochronology and monazite U(-Th)-Pb petrochronology: an example from the Archean Slave craton, Northwest Territories, Canada

Brendan Dyck, Kyle Patrick Larson, John M. Cottle, Rebecca Canam, Ethan Milkowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Advances in analytical instrumentation over the past decade have facilitated the development of new geochronological methods. In particular, the triple quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers with in-line reaction cells have made it possible to investigate beta decay geochronological systems, including Lu-Hf in garnet, in situ via laser ablation. While these new methods allow different kinds of studies to be carried out, their utility relative to well-established methods has not been investigated in detail. Herein we present the results of in situ garnet Lu-Hf and monazite U(-Th)-Pb geochronological analyses of two adjacent Archean meta-pelitic rocks from the Northwest Territories, Canada. Whereas the garnet Lu-Hf analyses define single population isochrons of ca. 2570 Ma, monazite U(-Th)-Pb analyses define two chemically distinct populations. An older ca. 2570 Ma monazite population has low Y concentrations, while a younger, ca. 2530 Ma monazite population has high Y concentrations. The change in Y concentrations in the monazite is consistent with coeveal growth with garnet during prograde metamorphism whereas the younger high Y monazite is interpreted to reflect growth during garnet breakdown during decompression. The results presented herein demonstrate that incorporating both in situ garnet and monazite geochronological data takes advantage of each method (i.e. the spatial precision, variable (re)crystalization under different conditions, and the ability to determine a date without relying on an isochron for monazite U-Pb, and the ability to date a primary metamorphic phase for garnet Lu-Hf) to build a more robust geochronological history.

Geological MagazineVol. 162
University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Government of Northwest Territories (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.