Quantifying the Effects of Water Status on Grapevine Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Grape Composition Through a Collaborative Analysis

The consolidation of scientific knowledge is based on the accumulation and understanding of previous findings. Nowadays, reviews of the scientific literature have become more effective through the use of meta‐analyses, which are systematic evaluations of the results from multiple studies. Similarly, mega‐analyses, which combine raw data from many studies into a single sample for processing and statistical analysis, are a very powerful tool for analyzing results of heterogeneous origin but require a high level of collaboration between the researchers contributing data. In the framework of a collaborative methodology between different Spanish viticultural research groups, this work uses a mega‐analytical approach to quantify the effects of changes in vine water status on vine vegetative growth, yield, and grape composition, integrating a wide range of growing conditions to obtain robust general trends of vine performance under water deficit. The mean seasonal stem water potential data from the different studies allowed a classification into five levels of water status (no deficit ⟶ mild ⟶ moderate ⟶ high ⟶ severe). A progressive decrease in vegetative growth with increasing deficit was observed, while yield decreased more markedly as water deficit progressed from moderate to high. On the other hand, titratable acidity was more sensitive to variation in water status than sugar concentration, with a greater decrease in titratable acidity when changing from no to moderate deficit. Conversely, increasing water deficit from moderate to high resulted in the greatest increases in grape anthocyanin in the red varieties explored. The results obtained in this work provide solid information on general trends in grapevine response to water deficit that can be used in simulation models or incorporated by grape growers in their decision‐making processes in relation not only to irrigation management but also on other agronomic tools to impact grapevine water status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ajgw/1588228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Effects of Water Status on Grapevine Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Grape Composition Through a Collaborative Analysis

Luis Gonzaga Santesteban, David Uriarte Hernández, Juan Luis Chacón Vozmediano, Ignacio Buesa et al.
1 citations
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
1.75
article

Quantifying the Effects of Water Status on Grapevine Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Grape Composition Through a Collaborative Analysis

Luis Gonzaga Santesteban, David Uriarte Hernández, Juan Luis Chacón Vozmediano, Ignacio Buesa, Fernando Visconti, C. Miranda, José Manuel Mirás‐Avalos, Míriam Lampreave, José M. Escalona, Diego S. Intrigliolo, Luis Rivacoba, J. Yuste, A. Montoro, Javier J. Cancela
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The consolidation of scientific knowledge is based on the accumulation and understanding of previous findings. Nowadays, reviews of the scientific literature have become more effective through the use of meta‐analyses, which are systematic evaluations of the results from multiple studies. Similarly, mega‐analyses, which combine raw data from many studies into a single sample for processing and statistical analysis, are a very powerful tool for analyzing results of heterogeneous origin but require a high level of collaboration between the researchers contributing data. In the framework of a collaborative methodology between different Spanish viticultural research groups, this work uses a mega‐analytical approach to quantify the effects of changes in vine water status on vine vegetative growth, yield, and grape composition, integrating a wide range of growing conditions to obtain robust general trends of vine performance under water deficit. The mean seasonal stem water potential data from the different studies allowed a classification into five levels of water status (no deficit ⟶ mild ⟶ moderate ⟶ high ⟶ severe). A progressive decrease in vegetative growth with increasing deficit was observed, while yield decreased more markedly as water deficit progressed from moderate to high. On the other hand, titratable acidity was more sensitive to variation in water status than sugar concentration, with a greater decrease in titratable acidity when changing from no to moderate deficit. Conversely, increasing water deficit from moderate to high resulted in the greatest increases in grape anthocyanin in the red varieties explored. The results obtained in this work provide solid information on general trends in grapevine response to water deficit that can be used in simulation models or incorporated by grape growers in their decision‐making processes in relation not only to irrigation management but also on other agronomic tools to impact grapevine water status.

Australian Journal of Grape and Wine ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Government of Extremadura (ES), Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ES), Centre d'Investigacions sobre Desertificació (ES), Technological Institute of Castilla y León (ES), Instituto Tecnico Agronómico Provincial (ES), Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (ES), Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia (ES), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.