Skin-Dwelling Bacteria Survive Preoperative Skin Preparation in Reconstruction Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Accurately determining the bacterial bioburden that survives preoperative skin preparation (PSP) is critical in understanding PSP efficacy and its limitations. Clinical PSP approval relies on a bacterial sampling method described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E1173-15. Though common, this technique may overlook deep-dwelling skin bacteria. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that deep-dwelling skin flora would survive PSP, and more growth would be detected using a destructive sampling method compared with ASTM E1173-15. <b>Methods:</b> Twelve female participants with a scheduled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) artery flap procedure at the Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City, UT, were enrolled between January and August 2024. PSP was performed using three 26 mL ChloraPrep applicators (2% CHG), and excess tissue was collected. Bacteria in the skin were quantified using a destructive sampling method and ASTM E1173-15, and bioburden outcomes were compared. Two participants were excluded from the quantitative analysis. <b>Results</b>: Bacteria survived PSP in every participant. A greater diversity and more bacteria were quantified with destructive sampling than ASTM E1173-15 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Generally, anaerobic bioburden values were higher than aerobic bioburden values. Higher bioburden correlated with processing more skin from a participant. Genotypic identification of select isolates identified <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> (formerly known as <i>Propionibacterium acnes</i>) as surviving bacteria, among others. Immunofluorescence revealed bacteria in all skin layers. No participant exhibited clinical signs of infection in the abdominal region. Human data corroborated previous porcine data collected using destructive skin sampling after PSP. <b>Conclusions</b>: Clinical PSP application does not create a sterile field. Destructive skin sampling techniques may be more effective than ASTM E1173-15 at resolving bacterial PSP survivors contributing to SSI risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skin-Dwelling Bacteria Survive Preoperative Skin Preparation in Reconstruction Surgery

Dustin L. Williams, Nicholas James Ashton, Hannah Robinson, Ryan W. Farnsworth et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Surgical site infection prevention
2.01
article

Skin-Dwelling Bacteria Survive Preoperative Skin Preparation in Reconstruction Surgery

Dustin L. Williams, Nicholas James Ashton, Hannah Robinson, Ryan W. Farnsworth, Alvin C. Kwok, A Blair, Laurel Ormiston, Porter Stulce
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Accurately determining the bacterial bioburden that survives preoperative skin preparation (PSP) is critical in understanding PSP efficacy and its limitations. Clinical PSP approval relies on a bacterial sampling method described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E1173-15. Though common, this technique may overlook deep-dwelling skin bacteria. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that deep-dwelling skin flora would survive PSP, and more growth would be detected using a destructive sampling method compared with ASTM E1173-15. <b>Methods:</b> Twelve female participants with a scheduled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) artery flap procedure at the Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City, UT, were enrolled between January and August 2024. PSP was performed using three 26 mL ChloraPrep applicators (2% CHG), and excess tissue was collected. Bacteria in the skin were quantified using a destructive sampling method and ASTM E1173-15, and bioburden outcomes were compared. Two participants were excluded from the quantitative analysis. <b>Results</b>: Bacteria survived PSP in every participant. A greater diversity and more bacteria were quantified with destructive sampling than ASTM E1173-15 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Generally, anaerobic bioburden values were higher than aerobic bioburden values. Higher bioburden correlated with processing more skin from a participant. Genotypic identification of select isolates identified <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> (formerly known as <i>Propionibacterium acnes</i>) as surviving bacteria, among others. Immunofluorescence revealed bacteria in all skin layers. No participant exhibited clinical signs of infection in the abdominal region. Human data corroborated previous porcine data collected using destructive skin sampling after PSP. <b>Conclusions</b>: Clinical PSP application does not create a sterile field. Destructive skin sampling techniques may be more effective than ASTM E1173-15 at resolving bacterial PSP survivors contributing to SSI risk.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(10)
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), University of Utah (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Utah, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Surgical site infection prevention
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.