Evaluation of synthetic data impact on fire segmentation models performance

Timely fire detection in industrial environments is crucial to safeguarding people and property. Deep neural networks have shown effectiveness in fire detection over traditional methods. However, they require high-quality datasets, which are costly and time-intensive to gather. To overcome this issue, we created the SYN-FIRE dataset, consisting of 2000 labeled images of simulated indoor industrial fires using NVIDIA Omniverse. By using U-Net++ as the baseline, this study explores the impact of the new SYN-FIRE dataset on models' performance when combined with four publicly available datasets. Two ablation studies were conducted: one replacing portions of real data from publicly available datasets with synthetic data and the other adding various amounts of synthetic data. With over 200 models trained across three resolutions, the results indicate that incorporating additional synthetic data improved DiceScore by [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] (FireBot and BowFire datasets, respectively) while substituting real data with synthetic data generally enhanced performance but with exceptions. Furthermore, tests on challenging real-life fire images confirmed that synthetic data boosts model generalization, supported by GRAD-CAM saliency maps. Finally, we provide key takeaways that point out the main findings of our research. The SYN-FIRE dataset is publicly available to encourage further research in fire detection and prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01571-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of synthetic data impact on fire segmentation models performance

Mitesh Patel, Tomasz Bednarz, Matej Arlović, Franko Hržić et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
3.91
article

Evaluation of synthetic data impact on fire segmentation models performance

Mitesh Patel, Tomasz Bednarz, Matej Arlović, Franko Hržić, Josip Balen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Timely fire detection in industrial environments is crucial to safeguarding people and property. Deep neural networks have shown effectiveness in fire detection over traditional methods. However, they require high-quality datasets, which are costly and time-intensive to gather. To overcome this issue, we created the SYN-FIRE dataset, consisting of 2000 labeled images of simulated indoor industrial fires using NVIDIA Omniverse. By using U-Net++ as the baseline, this study explores the impact of the new SYN-FIRE dataset on models' performance when combined with four publicly available datasets. Two ablation studies were conducted: one replacing portions of real data from publicly available datasets with synthetic data and the other adding various amounts of synthetic data. With over 200 models trained across three resolutions, the results indicate that incorporating additional synthetic data improved DiceScore by [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] (FireBot and BowFire datasets, respectively) while substituting real data with synthetic data generally enhanced performance but with exceptions. Furthermore, tests on challenging real-life fire images confirmed that synthetic data boosts model generalization, supported by GRAD-CAM saliency maps. Finally, we provide key takeaways that point out the main findings of our research. The SYN-FIRE dataset is publicly available to encourage further research in fire detection and prevention.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Rijeka (HR), Nvidia (United States) (US), University of Osijek (HR)
Nvidia, Ministarstvo znanosti i obrazovanja, European Commission, Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.