Social and Partisan Cleavages and the Demand and Supply of Democracy

This study investigates the relationship between social and partisan cleavages and the demand and supply of democracy. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, it argues that social heterogeneity is not inherently detrimental to democracy. Instead, the impact of social diversity is mediated by the composition of ethnic and social groups, which influences the intensity of electoral competition. While highly homogeneous and heterogeneous societies tend to have higher satisfaction with democracy, societies with an approximately even distribution of groups experience intense competition and lower satisfaction. This study utilizes data from the Global Barometer Surveys (2010–2013) across six regions to examine the relationship between preferences and satisfaction with democracy, along with ethnolinguistic, religious, and partisan cleavages. These findings suggest that the composition of cleavages, rather than their mere presence, is the key factor in determining the success of democracy. This study underscores the crucial role of institutional design in managing electoral competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Governance
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63851/001c.127933
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social and Partisan Cleavages and the Demand and Supply of Democracy

Kai-Ping Huang
Journal of Asian Governance
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

Social and Partisan Cleavages and the Demand and Supply of Democracy

Kai-Ping Huang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between social and partisan cleavages and the demand and supply of democracy. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, it argues that social heterogeneity is not inherently detrimental to democracy. Instead, the impact of social diversity is mediated by the composition of ethnic and social groups, which influences the intensity of electoral competition. While highly homogeneous and heterogeneous societies tend to have higher satisfaction with democracy, societies with an approximately even distribution of groups experience intense competition and lower satisfaction. This study utilizes data from the Global Barometer Surveys (2010–2013) across six regions to examine the relationship between preferences and satisfaction with democracy, along with ethnolinguistic, religious, and partisan cleavages. These findings suggest that the composition of cleavages, rather than their mere presence, is the key factor in determining the success of democracy. This study underscores the crucial role of institutional design in managing electoral competition.

Journal of Asian GovernanceVol. 1(1)
National Taiwan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.