Graphene's role in enhancing Fe <sub>3</sub> O <sub>4</sub> nanofibers: a comparative exploration of room temperature impedance characteristics and EMI shielding performance

In this work, an electrospinning technique was used for the fabrication of nanofibers to examine the structural, electrical, and EMI shielding characteristics of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-graphene (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr) nanofibers, exploring the potential contribution of graphene to the overall performance of Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>. A consistent fibrous morphology with an average diameter of 62 nm was shown in field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) analysis of the Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanofibers. However, the addition of graphene resulted in few aggregated fibers with an average diameter of 68 nm, which was slightly larger than that of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanofibers. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern confirms that the spinel structure of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> was retained in pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers. For both these nanofibers, impedance spectroscopy results showed a single semicircular response, indicating bulk relaxation processes. Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers exhibited greater bulk resistance at room temperature owing to the increased polarization effects introduced by graphene's conductive pathways. This effect was observed in the modulus plane plots, where Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr stored more energy as graphene enabled charge movement and changes in dielectric relaxation. Compared with Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers showed stronger polarization and higher dielectric constants, with two distinct relaxation peaks in the dielectric constant and tangent loss graphs. As per EMI shielding studies, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers were better than pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> in terms of total shielding effectiveness (SE<sub>T</sub>), mainly because graphene's conductive network helped increase the absorption component (SE<sub>A</sub>).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSC Advances
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra00006h
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graphene's role in enhancing Fe 3 O 4 nanofibers: a comparative exploration of room temperature impedance characteristics and EMI shielding performance

N.A. Noor, Sonia Kiran, Sadia Nazir, Ihab Mohamed Moussa et al.
8 citations
RSC Advances
Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
3.42
article

Graphene's role in enhancing Fe 3 O 4 nanofibers: a comparative exploration of room temperature impedance characteristics and EMI shielding performance

N.A. Noor, Sonia Kiran, Sadia Nazir, Ihab Mohamed Moussa, Ujala Anwar, Sohail Mumtaz, Roya Feroze
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In this work, an electrospinning technique was used for the fabrication of nanofibers to examine the structural, electrical, and EMI shielding characteristics of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-graphene (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr) nanofibers, exploring the potential contribution of graphene to the overall performance of Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>. A consistent fibrous morphology with an average diameter of 62 nm was shown in field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) analysis of the Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanofibers. However, the addition of graphene resulted in few aggregated fibers with an average diameter of 68 nm, which was slightly larger than that of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> nanofibers. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern confirms that the spinel structure of pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> was retained in pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers. For both these nanofibers, impedance spectroscopy results showed a single semicircular response, indicating bulk relaxation processes. Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers exhibited greater bulk resistance at room temperature owing to the increased polarization effects introduced by graphene's conductive pathways. This effect was observed in the modulus plane plots, where Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr stored more energy as graphene enabled charge movement and changes in dielectric relaxation. Compared with Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers showed stronger polarization and higher dielectric constants, with two distinct relaxation peaks in the dielectric constant and tangent loss graphs. As per EMI shielding studies, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>-Gr nanofibers were better than pure Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> in terms of total shielding effectiveness (SE<sub>T</sub>), mainly because graphene's conductive network helped increase the absorption component (SE<sub>A</sub>).

RSC AdvancesVol. 15(20)
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), Gachon University (KR), University of Lahore (PK), COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), University of Sargodha (PK), King Saud University (SA)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.