Identification of neglect syndrome in cerebral stroke patients using standard tests and eye tracking method

Introduction. About 30–40% of patients who have suffered from acute cerebrovascular accident (ACVA) experience a syndrome of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychological testing (NT) is a routine diagnostic technique, while the method eye tracking offers prospects for an objective assessment of visual attention. Objective. Evaluation of the diagnostic capabilities of classical neuropsychological techniques and eye tracking to detect the neglect syndrome in stroke patients. Materials and methods. The study involved 38 stroke patients (25 men, 13 women; mean age 59.7 ± 12.7 years). The Bells test (BT), Albert’s test (AT), Line bisection test (LBS), the computer version of the Apple test (ApT), and the eye tracking method (a search task for recording visual activity) were used to diagnose the neglect syndrome. Results. The LBS test data demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in the detection of neglect syndrome. Significant correlations ( p < 0.01) were obtained between the results of BT, AT, LBS, and ApT and the results of eye tracker visual search ( p = 0.025), indicating the detection of a similar degree of observed deficiency by different methods. The latency of finding stimuli in the left half-field when performing a search task on an eye tracker is significantly higher than in the right side ( p < 0.001). Ischemic stroke patients performed AT worse ( p = 0.009) than hemorrhagic stroke patients, and they were more mistaken in LBS ( p = 0.043). The more pronounced severity of the patients’ neglect, the worse the AT ( p = 0.004), LBS ( p = 0.05), and Aptego ( p = 0.036) were performed. The visual impairment factor had a significant effect in LBS testing ( p = 0.02). Conclusions. The combination of neuropsychological tests and eye tracking provides objective data for the diagnosis of neglect syndrome. The LBS test demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in detecting the neglect syndrome. The results of eye tracking were found to be comparable with those of pencil-and-paper tests, which increases the accuracy of the diagnosis of neglect syndrome. The following factors influencing the performance of diagnostic tests were identified: stroke type, neglect severity, and visual impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Extreme Medicine
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2025-308
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of neglect syndrome in cerebral stroke patients using standard tests and eye tracking method

Alina D. Aizenshtein, Galina Е. Ivanova, Marina A. Shurupova, S. A. Eneeva
Extreme Medicine
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

Identification of neglect syndrome in cerebral stroke patients using standard tests and eye tracking method

Alina D. Aizenshtein, Galina Е. Ivanova, Marina A. Shurupova, S. A. Eneeva
article en

Abstract

Introduction. About 30–40% of patients who have suffered from acute cerebrovascular accident (ACVA) experience a syndrome of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychological testing (NT) is a routine diagnostic technique, while the method eye tracking offers prospects for an objective assessment of visual attention. Objective. Evaluation of the diagnostic capabilities of classical neuropsychological techniques and eye tracking to detect the neglect syndrome in stroke patients. Materials and methods. The study involved 38 stroke patients (25 men, 13 women; mean age 59.7 ± 12.7 years). The Bells test (BT), Albert’s test (AT), Line bisection test (LBS), the computer version of the Apple test (ApT), and the eye tracking method (a search task for recording visual activity) were used to diagnose the neglect syndrome. Results. The LBS test data demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in the detection of neglect syndrome. Significant correlations ( p < 0.01) were obtained between the results of BT, AT, LBS, and ApT and the results of eye tracker visual search ( p = 0.025), indicating the detection of a similar degree of observed deficiency by different methods. The latency of finding stimuli in the left half-field when performing a search task on an eye tracker is significantly higher than in the right side ( p < 0.001). Ischemic stroke patients performed AT worse ( p = 0.009) than hemorrhagic stroke patients, and they were more mistaken in LBS ( p = 0.043). The more pronounced severity of the patients’ neglect, the worse the AT ( p = 0.004), LBS ( p = 0.05), and Aptego ( p = 0.036) were performed. The visual impairment factor had a significant effect in LBS testing ( p = 0.02). Conclusions. The combination of neuropsychological tests and eye tracking provides objective data for the diagnosis of neglect syndrome. The LBS test demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in detecting the neglect syndrome. The results of eye tracking were found to be comparable with those of pencil-and-paper tests, which increases the accuracy of the diagnosis of neglect syndrome. The following factors influencing the performance of diagnostic tests were identified: stroke type, neglect severity, and visual impairment.

Extreme MedicineVol. 27(2)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (RU), Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.