Comparative vibroacoustic analyses: FEM vs. IGA

Abstract This study demonstrates the efficiency (computational time vs. accuracy) of the Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) approach compared to the Isoparametric Finite Element Method (FEM), for solving a coupled vibroacoustic problem. Two different examples are investigated: 3D computations of cylindrical fluid cavity enclosed by a structural boundary and 3D computations of a simplified vehicle model. The methodology sequentially addresses the structural problem, the acoustic problem, and ultimately the coupled vibroacoustic analysis. The primary variables under examination are the eigenfrequencies in these three configurations for both examples. A comparative analysis of FEM and IGA results is performed against a reference solution, focusing on eigenfrequency outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Mechanics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-025-02639-9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative vibroacoustic analyses: FEM vs. IGA

Roberto Citarella, Jean‐François Deü, Tommaso Landi, Christophe Hoareau et al.
4 citations
Computational Mechanics
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
5.34
article

Comparative vibroacoustic analyses: FEM vs. IGA

Roberto Citarella, Jean‐François Deü, Tommaso Landi, Christophe Hoareau, Roger Ohayon
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study demonstrates the efficiency (computational time vs. accuracy) of the Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) approach compared to the Isoparametric Finite Element Method (FEM), for solving a coupled vibroacoustic problem. Two different examples are investigated: 3D computations of cylindrical fluid cavity enclosed by a structural boundary and 3D computations of a simplified vehicle model. The methodology sequentially addresses the structural problem, the acoustic problem, and ultimately the coupled vibroacoustic analysis. The primary variables under examination are the eigenfrequencies in these three configurations for both examples. A comparative analysis of FEM and IGA results is performed against a reference solution, focusing on eigenfrequency outcomes.

Computational MechanicsVol. 76(4)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), University of Salerno (IT)
Università degli Studi di Salerno
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.