In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators

This study was aimed to evaluate in vivo and in vitro accuracy and precision of Root ZXMini, Raypex6 and PropexPixi electronic apex locators (EALs) in both dry and wet conditions (5.25% NaOCl, sterile saline, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA). Fifty vital maxillary and mandibular incisors were included in in vivo, and 50 maxillary central incisors were used in the in vitro study. Measurements were classified as successful if stable electronic working lengths (EWLs) were within ±0.5 mm of actual working length (AWL). Statistics were performed using paired sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-Square (p < 0.05). No significant differences in precision, accuracy and success rates were found among EALs (p > 0.05). Root ZXMini and Raypex6 could directly detect a 0.5 mm coronal zone than major apical foramen (MAF) in both settings. After a 0.5 mm reduction as recommended by the manufacturer, Propex Pixi in vivo EWLs could be between AWL and MAF; in vitro EWLs could be within 0.5 mm coronal than AWL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12946
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators

Rüstem Kemal Sübay, Özlem Kara
2 citations
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
3.58
article

In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators

Rüstem Kemal Sübay, Özlem Kara
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate in vivo and in vitro accuracy and precision of Root ZXMini, Raypex6 and PropexPixi electronic apex locators (EALs) in both dry and wet conditions (5.25% NaOCl, sterile saline, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA). Fifty vital maxillary and mandibular incisors were included in in vivo, and 50 maxillary central incisors were used in the in vitro study. Measurements were classified as successful if stable electronic working lengths (EWLs) were within ±0.5 mm of actual working length (AWL). Statistics were performed using paired sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-Square (p < 0.05). No significant differences in precision, accuracy and success rates were found among EALs (p > 0.05). Root ZXMini and Raypex6 could directly detect a 0.5 mm coronal zone than major apical foramen (MAF) in both settings. After a 0.5 mm reduction as recommended by the manufacturer, Propex Pixi in vivo EWLs could be between AWL and MAF; in vitro EWLs could be within 0.5 mm coronal than AWL.

Australian Endodontic JournalVol. 51(2)
Istanbul University (TR)
Istanbul Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In Vivo and In Vitro Accuracy and Precision Evaluations of Mini Electronic Apex Locators — Rüstem Kemal Sübay, Özlem Kara · Australian Endodontic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS