A novel assessment system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

The objective of this study was to introduce and validate a novel developed scoring system tailored specifically for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), aiming to provide guidance for treatment selection. A retrospective analysis spanning from March 2016 to March 2021 was conducted on 208 patients diagnosed with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) who received conservative treatment. Patients were categorized into low-score (47 cases), medium-score (98 cases), and high-score (63 cases) groups based on the Novel Assessment System for OVCFs (NASOVCF) scores. Comparative analyses of radiographic and clinical data were performed, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis. The high-score group exhibited significantly inferior outcomes, characterized by higher Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (P < 0.05), increased vertebral height loss, and kyphosis angle differences compared to the low and medium-score groups (P < 0.05). Notably, a bone union rate of 38.1% (24/63) was observed in the high-score group, significantly lower than that of the low-score group (97.9%, 46/47). Furthermore, the progressive kyphosis rate was 47.6% (30/63) in the high-score group, significantly higher than the 17.3% (17/98) observed in the medium-score group and the 2.2% (1/46) observed in the low-score group. In multivariate analysis, higher NASOVCF score emerged as an independent risk factor for bone non-union (OR = 1.713, 95% CI 1.458-2.013, P < 0.001). Similarly, higher NASOVCF score (OR = 1.373, 95% CI 1.203-1.568, P < 0.001), along with female gender and higher pre-treatment ODI score, were identified as independent risk factors for progressive kyphosis. The area under the curve (AUC) for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis were 0.895 and 0.835, respectively, indicating robust discriminative performances. Higher NASOVCF score was identified as a significant risk factor for non-union and progressive kyphosis following conservative treatment in OVCFs. NASOVCF score emerged as a crucial predictor for adverse outcomes in patients at high risk who underwent conservative management. Surgical interventions such as vertebral augmentation may represent a potentially superior option for individuals with high NASOVCF scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01839-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel assessment system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Zhibo Deng, Lin Zhao, Jie Xu, Weiqi Han et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
6.02
article

A novel assessment system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Zhibo Deng, Lin Zhao, Jie Xu, Weiqi Han, Jun Luo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to introduce and validate a novel developed scoring system tailored specifically for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), aiming to provide guidance for treatment selection. A retrospective analysis spanning from March 2016 to March 2021 was conducted on 208 patients diagnosed with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) who received conservative treatment. Patients were categorized into low-score (47 cases), medium-score (98 cases), and high-score (63 cases) groups based on the Novel Assessment System for OVCFs (NASOVCF) scores. Comparative analyses of radiographic and clinical data were performed, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis. The high-score group exhibited significantly inferior outcomes, characterized by higher Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (P < 0.05), increased vertebral height loss, and kyphosis angle differences compared to the low and medium-score groups (P < 0.05). Notably, a bone union rate of 38.1% (24/63) was observed in the high-score group, significantly lower than that of the low-score group (97.9%, 46/47). Furthermore, the progressive kyphosis rate was 47.6% (30/63) in the high-score group, significantly higher than the 17.3% (17/98) observed in the medium-score group and the 2.2% (1/46) observed in the low-score group. In multivariate analysis, higher NASOVCF score emerged as an independent risk factor for bone non-union (OR = 1.713, 95% CI 1.458-2.013, P < 0.001). Similarly, higher NASOVCF score (OR = 1.373, 95% CI 1.203-1.568, P < 0.001), along with female gender and higher pre-treatment ODI score, were identified as independent risk factors for progressive kyphosis. The area under the curve (AUC) for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis were 0.895 and 0.835, respectively, indicating robust discriminative performances. Higher NASOVCF score was identified as a significant risk factor for non-union and progressive kyphosis following conservative treatment in OVCFs. NASOVCF score emerged as a crucial predictor for adverse outcomes in patients at high risk who underwent conservative management. Surgical interventions such as vertebral augmentation may represent a potentially superior option for individuals with high NASOVCF scores.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN)
Shaoxing Bureau of Science and Technology, Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.