The Effect of Twine Thickness of Monofilament Gillnets on the Catchability and Fishing Gear Losses For Pikeperch (Sander Lucioperca (L., 1758)) Fishing

In this study, the effect of twine thicknesses on the catch efficiency in monofilament gillnets were investigated. Field trials were carried out in Seyhan Dam Lake between September 2020 and September 2021 on a monthly basis. Net codes with different mesh sizes (bar length) and twine thicknesses were as follows, respectively: 1=26 mm 0.16 mm, 2=26 mm 0.18 mm, 3=28 mm 0.16 mm, 4=28 mm 0.20 mm, 5=30 mm 0.16 mm, 6=30 mm 0.20 mm, 7=30 mm 0.33 mm, 8=32 mm 0.16 mm, 9=32 mm 0.20 mm. A total of 34 experimental fishing operations were carried out. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the catch efficiency of thin twine and thick twine in nets with 26 mm and 32 mm mesh sizes (p>0.05). However, significant differences were found in the 28 mm mesh size (p<0.05). In gillnet with 30 mm mesh size, no statistical differences were observed in catch efficiency between net codes 5 and 6 (p> 0.05). However, statistical differences were found in catch efficiency between net codes 5 and 7, as well as between codes 6 and 7 (p <0.05). These results indicate that a 12.5% (twine thickness: 0.16-0.18 mm) and 25% (twine thickness:0.16-0.20 mm) increase in rope thickness did not affect catch yield, whereas a 65% (twine thickness: 0.20-0.33 mm) increase did..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Aquatica Turcica
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.1591204
Primary Topic
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Twine Thickness of Monofilament Gillnets on the Catchability and Fishing Gear Losses For Pikeperch (Sander Lucioperca (L., 1758)) Fishing

Caner Enver Özyurt, A. Atılgan, Kenan Akman
1 links
Acta Aquatica Turcica
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
article

The Effect of Twine Thickness of Monofilament Gillnets on the Catchability and Fishing Gear Losses For Pikeperch (Sander Lucioperca (L., 1758)) Fishing

Caner Enver Özyurt, A. Atılgan, Kenan Akman
article en

Abstract

In this study, the effect of twine thicknesses on the catch efficiency in monofilament gillnets were investigated. Field trials were carried out in Seyhan Dam Lake between September 2020 and September 2021 on a monthly basis. Net codes with different mesh sizes (bar length) and twine thicknesses were as follows, respectively: 1=26 mm 0.16 mm, 2=26 mm 0.18 mm, 3=28 mm 0.16 mm, 4=28 mm 0.20 mm, 5=30 mm 0.16 mm, 6=30 mm 0.20 mm, 7=30 mm 0.33 mm, 8=32 mm 0.16 mm, 9=32 mm 0.20 mm. A total of 34 experimental fishing operations were carried out. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the catch efficiency of thin twine and thick twine in nets with 26 mm and 32 mm mesh sizes (p>0.05). However, significant differences were found in the 28 mm mesh size (p<0.05). In gillnet with 30 mm mesh size, no statistical differences were observed in catch efficiency between net codes 5 and 6 (p> 0.05). However, statistical differences were found in catch efficiency between net codes 5 and 7, as well as between codes 6 and 7 (p <0.05). These results indicate that a 12.5% (twine thickness: 0.16-0.18 mm) and 25% (twine thickness:0.16-0.20 mm) increase in rope thickness did not affect catch yield, whereas a 65% (twine thickness: 0.20-0.33 mm) increase did..

Acta Aquatica TurcicaVol. 21(2)
Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.