Recommendations for estimating and detecting time-varying spawner-recruit dynamics in fish populations

Models that account for time-varying dynamics are increasingly used in population assessments in recognition of changing biological and environmental conditions. We performed a systematic simulation analysis based on a semelparous life history to evaluate the performance of various Ricker spawner-recruit models including stationary, random-walk, and regime shift models, that offer various interpretations of time-varying dynamics. Estimation models that allowed parameters to vary following random-walks tended to perform equally well or outperform regime shift and stationary models. However these results were not consistent across all scenarios examined. We also evaluated the performance of model selection criteria commonly used to identify time-varying processes. Both likelihood based model selection criteria (AICc and BIC) and cross-validation methods (LFO) were found to be unreliable, with a few exceptions. Changes in productivity were more identifiable than changes in capacity or both parameters, which were often indiscernible from stationary dynamics. The results were sensitive to the magnitude of parameter change and extent of residual variability (unexplained error), with greater changes and lower error being easier to accurately estimate and select. Given this context dependence for the accuracy of parameter estimates with time-varying models, and unreliable nature of selection criteria, we recommend that analysts conduct case-specific simulation-evaluations when model choices may have important and divergent management implications. • Time-varying spawner-recruit models have promise for tracking changing dynamics. • Simulation was used to estimate precision and accuracy of different model forms. • Random walk models had the best performance when compared to hidden Markov models. • Changes in productivity were easier to detect and estimate than changes in capacity. • Model selection criteria were unreliable but performance varied across scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Modelling
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations for estimating and detecting time-varying spawner-recruit dynamics in fish populations

Carrie A. Holt, Dan A. Greenberg, Megan L. Feddern, Brendan Connors et al.
1 citations
Ecological Modelling
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
article

Recommendations for estimating and detecting time-varying spawner-recruit dynamics in fish populations

Carrie A. Holt, Dan A. Greenberg, Megan L. Feddern, Brendan Connors, Cameron Freshwater, Catarina Wor, Mackenzie Mazur, Gregory L. Britten
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Models that account for time-varying dynamics are increasingly used in population assessments in recognition of changing biological and environmental conditions. We performed a systematic simulation analysis based on a semelparous life history to evaluate the performance of various Ricker spawner-recruit models including stationary, random-walk, and regime shift models, that offer various interpretations of time-varying dynamics. Estimation models that allowed parameters to vary following random-walks tended to perform equally well or outperform regime shift and stationary models. However these results were not consistent across all scenarios examined. We also evaluated the performance of model selection criteria commonly used to identify time-varying processes. Both likelihood based model selection criteria (AICc and BIC) and cross-validation methods (LFO) were found to be unreliable, with a few exceptions. Changes in productivity were more identifiable than changes in capacity or both parameters, which were often indiscernible from stationary dynamics. The results were sensitive to the magnitude of parameter change and extent of residual variability (unexplained error), with greater changes and lower error being easier to accurately estimate and select. Given this context dependence for the accuracy of parameter estimates with time-varying models, and unreliable nature of selection criteria, we recommend that analysts conduct case-specific simulation-evaluations when model choices may have important and divergent management implications. • Time-varying spawner-recruit models have promise for tracking changing dynamics. • Simulation was used to estimate precision and accuracy of different model forms. • Random walk models had the best performance when compared to hidden Markov models. • Changes in productivity were easier to detect and estimate than changes in capacity. • Model selection criteria were unreliable but performance varied across scenarios.

Ecological ModellingVol. 507
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.