Correlating the oral swab microbial community with milk production metrics in Holstein dairy cows

Oral swabs of dairy cows have been suggested as a proxy for direct ruminal sampling, and this approach can identify the presence of up to 70% of the rumen microbial community. Here, we further extend the utility of this approach by correlating the bacterial community of swabs collected from 226 dairy cows on a research farm in Wisconsin, USA, with average milk yield and days in milk, two phenotypes previously associated with differences in the ruminal microbiome. We then obtained milk production efficiency data for a subset of these animals (gross feed efficiency [GFE] and residual feed intake [RFI]) and correlated these metrics against their associated microbial data. We found that when using the oral swabs, we could identify correlations between bacterial genera and days in milk (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We further show that the ruminal microbiota was associated with average milk yield and days in milk for animals in their first lactation. Differential abundance testing identified amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with these metrics (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Our comparison of bacterial communities between high and low efficiency groups, as determined by GFE and RFI, identified a significant difference in Shannon's diversity in second lactation cows (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We also found that RFI was significantly correlated with the bacterial community in second lactation animals (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Differential abundance analysis identified multiple oral- and rumen-associated ASVs correlated with GFE and RFI (<i>P</i> < 0.05). This study further establishes the utility of oral swabs as a ruminal proxy.IMPORTANCEImproving milk production efficiency is a key goal in the dairy industry and is traditionally pursued through genetic selection, diet optimization, and herd management practices. The ruminal microbiome, essential for digesting feed, has been linked to milk production efficiency, suggesting that microbiome modulation could improve efficiency. However, the integration of rumen microbiology into current management practices is hampered by the difficulty of large-scale rumen sampling, as proxies like fecal samples do not accurately reflect the ruminal microbiota. Traditional methods, like cannulation and stomach tubing, are labor-intensive and impractical for extensive sampling. Our research demonstrates the potential use of oral swabs as a scalable, effective method for characterizing the microbiome and its associations with milk production metrics, recapitulating established associations obtained through traditional ruminal sampling methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mSphere
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00167-25
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlating the oral swab microbial community with milk production metrics in Holstein dairy cows

Derek M. Bickhart, Dino Lorenzo Sbardellati, Ibrahim Zúñiga-Chaves, Joseph H. Skarlupka et al.
mSphere
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Correlating the oral swab microbial community with milk production metrics in Holstein dairy cows

Derek M. Bickhart, Dino Lorenzo Sbardellati, Ibrahim Zúñiga-Chaves, Joseph H. Skarlupka, Jennifer C. McClure, Eric Paget, Andrew J. Steinberger, Garret Suen, Madison S. Cox, Andrew J. Scheftgen, Charles Skadron, Nithya Attipetty
article en

Abstract

Oral swabs of dairy cows have been suggested as a proxy for direct ruminal sampling, and this approach can identify the presence of up to 70% of the rumen microbial community. Here, we further extend the utility of this approach by correlating the bacterial community of swabs collected from 226 dairy cows on a research farm in Wisconsin, USA, with average milk yield and days in milk, two phenotypes previously associated with differences in the ruminal microbiome. We then obtained milk production efficiency data for a subset of these animals (gross feed efficiency [GFE] and residual feed intake [RFI]) and correlated these metrics against their associated microbial data. We found that when using the oral swabs, we could identify correlations between bacterial genera and days in milk (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We further show that the ruminal microbiota was associated with average milk yield and days in milk for animals in their first lactation. Differential abundance testing identified amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) associated with these metrics (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Our comparison of bacterial communities between high and low efficiency groups, as determined by GFE and RFI, identified a significant difference in Shannon's diversity in second lactation cows (<i>P</i> < 0.05). We also found that RFI was significantly correlated with the bacterial community in second lactation animals (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Differential abundance analysis identified multiple oral- and rumen-associated ASVs correlated with GFE and RFI (<i>P</i> < 0.05). This study further establishes the utility of oral swabs as a ruminal proxy.IMPORTANCEImproving milk production efficiency is a key goal in the dairy industry and is traditionally pursued through genetic selection, diet optimization, and herd management practices. The ruminal microbiome, essential for digesting feed, has been linked to milk production efficiency, suggesting that microbiome modulation could improve efficiency. However, the integration of rumen microbiology into current management practices is hampered by the difficulty of large-scale rumen sampling, as proxies like fecal samples do not accurately reflect the ruminal microbiota. Traditional methods, like cannulation and stomach tubing, are labor-intensive and impractical for extensive sampling. Our research demonstrates the potential use of oral swabs as a scalable, effective method for characterizing the microbiome and its associations with milk production metrics, recapitulating established associations obtained through traditional ruminal sampling methods.

mSphereVol. 10(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Washington (US), Hendrix Genetics (Canada) (CA), U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center (US), University of California, Davis (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.