Generalized Predictive Control for a Single-Phase, Three-Level Voltage Source Inverter

In recent years, the study of model predictive control (MPC) in power electronics has gained significant attention due to its ability to optimize system performance and improve the dynamic control of complex power converters. There are two types of MPC: finite control set (FCS) and continuous control set (CCS). The FCS–MPC has been studied more in regard to these two types of control due to its easy and intuitive implementation. However, FCS–MPC has some drawbacks, such as the exponential growth of the computational burden as the prediction horizon increases and, in some cases, a variable frequency. In contrast, generalized predictive control (GPC), part of CCS–MPC, offers significant advantages. It enables the use of a longer prediction horizon without increasing the computational burden in regard to its implementation, which has practical implications for the efficiency and performance of power converters. This paper presents the design of GPC applied to single-phase multilevel voltage source inverters, highlighting its advantages over FCS–MPC. The controller is optimized offline, significantly reducing the computational cost of implementation. Moreover, the controller is tested in regard to R, RL, and nonlinear loads. Finally, the validation results using a medium-performance controller and a Hardware-in-the-Loop device highlight the improved behavior of the proposed GPC, maintaining a harmonic distortion of less than 1.2% for R and RL loads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102541
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized Predictive Control for a Single-Phase, Three-Level Voltage Source Inverter

Diego Arcos-Avilés, Wilmar Martínez, Josué Andino, Diego Naunay et al.
1 citations
Energies
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
0.73
article

Generalized Predictive Control for a Single-Phase, Three-Level Voltage Source Inverter

Diego Arcos-Avilés, Wilmar Martínez, Josué Andino, Diego Naunay, Paúl Ayala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the study of model predictive control (MPC) in power electronics has gained significant attention due to its ability to optimize system performance and improve the dynamic control of complex power converters. There are two types of MPC: finite control set (FCS) and continuous control set (CCS). The FCS–MPC has been studied more in regard to these two types of control due to its easy and intuitive implementation. However, FCS–MPC has some drawbacks, such as the exponential growth of the computational burden as the prediction horizon increases and, in some cases, a variable frequency. In contrast, generalized predictive control (GPC), part of CCS–MPC, offers significant advantages. It enables the use of a longer prediction horizon without increasing the computational burden in regard to its implementation, which has practical implications for the efficiency and performance of power converters. This paper presents the design of GPC applied to single-phase multilevel voltage source inverters, highlighting its advantages over FCS–MPC. The controller is optimized offline, significantly reducing the computational cost of implementation. Moreover, the controller is tested in regard to R, RL, and nonlinear loads. Finally, the validation results using a medium-performance controller and a Hardware-in-the-Loop device highlight the improved behavior of the proposed GPC, maintaining a harmonic distortion of less than 1.2% for R and RL loads.

EnergiesVol. 18(10)
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE (EC), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), IMDEA Energy Institute (ES), KU Leuven (BE)
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.