Application of Machine Learning Methods for Gravity Anomaly Prediction

Gravity anomalies play critical roles in geological analysis, geodynamic monitoring, and precise geoid modeling. Obtaining accurate gravity data is challenging, particularly in inaccessible or sparsely covered regions. This study evaluates machine learning (ML) methods—Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Ensemble of Trees—for predicting gravity anomalies in southeastern Kazakhstan and compares their effectiveness with traditional Kriging interpolation. A dataset, consisting of the simple Bouguer anomaly values, latitude, longitude, elevation, normal gravity, and terrain corrections derived from historical maps at a scale of 1:200,000, was utilized. Models were trained and validated using cross-validation techniques, with performance assessed by statistical metrics (RMSE, MAE, R2) and spatial error analysis. Results indicated that the Exponential GPR model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, outperforming other ML methods, with 72.9% of predictions having errors below 1 mGal. Kriging showed comparable accuracy and superior robustness against extreme errors. Most prediction errors from all methods were spatially associated with mountainous regions featuring significant elevation changes. While this study demonstrated the effectiveness of machine learning methods for gravity anomaly prediction, their accuracy decreases in complex terrain, indicating the need for further research to improve model performance in such environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15050175
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Machine Learning Methods for Gravity Anomaly Prediction

Ainur Yerzhankyzy, Elmira Orynbassarova, Khaini-Kamal Kassymkanova, Bakhberde Adebiyet et al.
2 citations
Geosciences
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
article

Application of Machine Learning Methods for Gravity Anomaly Prediction

Ainur Yerzhankyzy, Elmira Orynbassarova, Khaini-Kamal Kassymkanova, Bakhberde Adebiyet, Maksat Zakariya, Katima Zhanakulova, Р.С. Абдыкалыкова
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Gravity anomalies play critical roles in geological analysis, geodynamic monitoring, and precise geoid modeling. Obtaining accurate gravity data is challenging, particularly in inaccessible or sparsely covered regions. This study evaluates machine learning (ML) methods—Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Ensemble of Trees—for predicting gravity anomalies in southeastern Kazakhstan and compares their effectiveness with traditional Kriging interpolation. A dataset, consisting of the simple Bouguer anomaly values, latitude, longitude, elevation, normal gravity, and terrain corrections derived from historical maps at a scale of 1:200,000, was utilized. Models were trained and validated using cross-validation techniques, with performance assessed by statistical metrics (RMSE, MAE, R2) and spatial error analysis. Results indicated that the Exponential GPR model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, outperforming other ML methods, with 72.9% of predictions having errors below 1 mGal. Kriging showed comparable accuracy and superior robustness against extreme errors. Most prediction errors from all methods were spatially associated with mountainous regions featuring significant elevation changes. While this study demonstrated the effectiveness of machine learning methods for gravity anomaly prediction, their accuracy decreases in complex terrain, indicating the need for further research to improve model performance in such environments.

GeosciencesVol. 15(5)
Satbayev University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
3.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.