Prediction of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Electrocardiogram

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated cardiovascular adverse events are relatively uncommon; they can be life-threatening, particularly when involving malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Electrocardiographic markers such as P-wave dispersion (PWD), QT dispersion (QTd), T-peak to T-end (Tp-e) interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios have been linked to an elevated risk of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death across various cardiac conditions. Monitoring these parameters may aid in identifying the risk of arrhythmogenic events in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 42 patients with cancer who received ICI therapy and had serial 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at baseline and at three-month intervals during the first year of treatment, from May 2022 to November 2023. ECG parameters including PWD, QTd, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios were measured and compared between baseline and follow-up time points. <b>Results</b>: The median follow-up duration was 5.3 months (range: 0.5-18.9 months). No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the ECG parameters between baseline and subsequent measurements (<i>p</i> > 0.05). One patient developed atrial fibrillation during the third month of treatment. Additionally, one patient exhibited a left anterior fascicular block, and another experienced frequent ventricular extrasystoles. No malignant ventricular arrhythmias were reported throughout the study period. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study found no significant changes in electrocardiographic markers associated with arrhythmia risk during ICI treatment. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies with extended follow-up are warranted to further elucidate the cardiovascular safety profile of ICIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101235
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Electrocardiogram

Fatih Levent, Ömer Furkan Demir, Ahmet Bilgehan Şahin, Eyüp Çoban et al.
Diagnostics
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
article

Prediction of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Electrocardiogram

Fatih Levent, Ömer Furkan Demir, Ahmet Bilgehan Şahin, Eyüp Çoban, Seda Sali, Erhan Tenekecioglu, Türkkan Evrensel, Fahriye Vatansever Ağca, Adem Deligönül, Fatih Koca, Ece Çelebi Coşkun, Erdem Cubukcu, Alper Coşkun
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated cardiovascular adverse events are relatively uncommon; they can be life-threatening, particularly when involving malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Electrocardiographic markers such as P-wave dispersion (PWD), QT dispersion (QTd), T-peak to T-end (Tp-e) interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios have been linked to an elevated risk of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death across various cardiac conditions. Monitoring these parameters may aid in identifying the risk of arrhythmogenic events in cancer patients undergoing ICI therapy. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 42 patients with cancer who received ICI therapy and had serial 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at baseline and at three-month intervals during the first year of treatment, from May 2022 to November 2023. ECG parameters including PWD, QTd, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios were measured and compared between baseline and follow-up time points. <b>Results</b>: The median follow-up duration was 5.3 months (range: 0.5-18.9 months). No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the ECG parameters between baseline and subsequent measurements (<i>p</i> > 0.05). One patient developed atrial fibrillation during the third month of treatment. Additionally, one patient exhibited a left anterior fascicular block, and another experienced frequent ventricular extrasystoles. No malignant ventricular arrhythmias were reported throughout the study period. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study found no significant changes in electrocardiographic markers associated with arrhythmia risk during ICI treatment. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies with extended follow-up are warranted to further elucidate the cardiovascular safety profile of ICIs.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(10)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Bursa Technical University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), S.B.Ü. Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.